90 FR 129 pgs. 30266-30267 - Hayriye Gok, M.D.; Decision and Order

Type: NOTICEVolume: 90Number: 129Pages: 30266 - 30267
FR document: [FR Doc. 2025-12703 Filed 7-8-25; 8:45 am]
Agency: Justice Department
Sub Agency: Drug Enforcement Administration
Official PDF Version:  PDF Version
Pages: 30266, 30267

[top] page 30266

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Hayriye Gok, M.D.; Decision and Order

On February 20, 2025, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA or Government) issued an Order to Show Cause (OSC) to Hayriye Gok, M.D., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Registrant). Request for Final Agency Action (RFAA), Exhibit (RFAAX) 1, at 1, 4. The OSC proposed the revocation of Registrant's Certificate of Registration (COR) No. FG3991115, alleging that Registrant is "currently without authority to . . . handle controlled substances in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the state in which [she is] registered with DEA." Id. at 2 (citing 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3)).

The OSC notified Registrant of her right to file a written request for hearing, and that if she failed to file such a request, she would be deemed to have waived her right to a hearing and be in default. Id. at 2-3 (citing 21 CFR 1301.43). Here, Registrant did not request a hearing. RFAA, at 4. 1 "A default, unless excused, shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of the registrant's/applicant's right to a hearing and an admission of the factual allegations of the [OSC]." 21 CFR 1301.43(e).

Footnotes:

1 ?Based on the Government's submissions in its RFAA dated April 3, 2025, the Agency finds that service of the OSC on Registrant was adequate. The included declaration from a DEA Diversion Investigator (DI) indicates that on February 20, 2025, DI attempted to serve Registrant the OSC at her DEA registered address and to contact her using her DEA registered telephone number, but both attempts were unsuccessful. RFAAX 2, at 1. Later that same day, DI successfully served Registrant the OSC via her DEA registered email address. Id. at 1-2. Registrant responded to DI's email, confirming receipt and stating that she "read the [OSC]," but she did not request a hearing in her responses. Id. Accordingly, the Agency finds that the Government's service of the OSC on Registrant was adequate. See Mohammed S. Aljanaby, M.D., 82 FR 34552, 34552 (2017) (finding that service by email satisfies due process where the email is not returned as undeliverable and other methods have been unsuccessful); Emilio Luna, M.D., 77 FR 4829, 4830 (2012) (same).

Further, "[i]n the event that a registrant . . . is deemed to be in default . . . DEA may then file a request for final agency action with the Administrator, along with a record to support its request. In such circumstances, the Administrator may enter a default final order pursuant to [21 CFR]?1316.67." Id. at 1301.43(f)(1). Here, the Government has requested final agency action based on Registrant's default pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43(c) and (f), 1301.46. RFAA, at 1; see also 21 CFR 1316.67.

Findings of Fact


[top] The Agency finds that, in light of Registrant's default, the factual allegations in the OSC are deemed admitted. According to the OSC, Registrant's Pennsylvania medical license was temporarily suspended by the Pennsylvania State Board of Medicine (Board) on November 21, 2024. RFAAX 1, at 2; see also RFAAX 3. 2 According to Pennsylvania online records, of which the Agency takes page 30267 official notice, 3 Registrant's Pennsylvania medical license has a status of "Suspension." Pennsylvania BPOA License Search, https://www.pals.pa.gov/#!/page/search (last visited date of signature of this Order). Accordingly, the Agency finds that Registrant is not licensed to practice medicine in Pennsylvania, the state in which she is registered with DEA. 4

Footnotes:

2 ?Although not required, the Government also submitted the Board's Memorandum Order, which indefinitely suspended Registrant's state medical license on February 25, 2025. RFAA, at 4; see also RFAAX 4. While this submission cannot be admitted by default because it was not originally included in the OSC, the Agency does take notice of the development and its inclusion in the RFAA. See Victor Augusto Silva, M.D., 90 FR 16002, 16002 n.4 (2025) (finding that "a registrant's deemed admission of the factual allegations based on a default applies to the facts in the OSC only").

3 ?Under the Administrative Procedure Act, an agency "may take official notice of facts at any stage in a proceeding-even in the final decision." United States Department of Justice, Attorney General's Manual on the Administrative Procedure Act 80 (1947) (Wm. W. Gaunt & Sons, Inc., Reprint 1979).

4 ?Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 556(e), "[w]hen an agency decision rests on official notice of a material fact not appearing in the evidence in the record, a party is entitled, on timely request, to an opportunity to show the contrary." The material fact here is that Registrant, as of the date of this Order, is not licensed to practice medicine in Pennsylvania. Accordingly, Registrant may dispute the Agency's finding by filing a properly supported motion for reconsideration of findings of fact within fifteen calendar days of the date of this Order. Any such motion and response shall be filed and served by email to the other party and to the DEA Office of the Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration, at dea.addo.attorneys@dea.gov.

Discussion

Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3), the Attorney General may suspend or revoke a registration issued under 21 U.S.C. 823 "upon a finding that the registrant . . . has had [her] State license or registration suspended . . . [or] revoked . . . by competent State authority and is no longer authorized by State law to engage in the . . . dispensing of controlled substances." With respect to a practitioner, DEA has also long held that the possession of authority to dispense controlled substances under the laws of the state in which a practitioner engages in professional practice is a fundamental condition for obtaining and maintaining a practitioner's registration. Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243, 270 (2006) ("The Attorney General can register a physician to dispense controlled substances `if the applicant is authorized to dispense . . . controlled substances under the laws of the State in which he practices.' . . . The very definition of a `practitioner' eligible to prescribe includes physicians `licensed, registered, or otherwise permitted, by the United States or the jurisdiction in which he practices' to dispense controlled substances. §?802(21)"). The Agency has applied these principles consistently. See, e.g., James L. Hooper, M.D., 76 FR 71371, 71372 (2011), pet. for rev. denied, 481 F. App'x 826 (4th Cir. 2012); Frederick Marsh Blanton, M.D., 43 FR 27616, 27617 (1978). 5

Footnotes:

5 ?This rule derives from the text of two provisions of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). First, Congress defined the term "practitioner" to mean "a physician . . . or other person licensed, registered, or otherwise permitted, by . . . the jurisdiction in which he practices . . . , to distribute, dispense, . . . [or] administer . . . a controlled substance in the course of professional practice." 21 U.S.C. 802(21). Second, in setting the requirements for obtaining a practitioner's registration, Congress directed that "[t]he Attorney General shall register practitioners . . . if the applicant is authorized to dispense . . . controlled substances under the laws of the State in which he practices." 21 U.S.C. 823(g)(1). Because Congress has clearly mandated that a practitioner possess state authority in order to be deemed a practitioner under the CSA, DEA has held repeatedly that revocation of a practitioner's registration is the appropriate sanction whenever he or she is no longer authorized to dispense controlled substances under the laws of the state in which he or she practices. See, e.g., James L. Hooper, M.D., 76 FR at 71371-72; Sheran Arden Yeates, M.D., 71 FR 39130, 39131 (2006); Dominick A. Ricci, M.D., 58 FR 51104, 51105 (1993); Bobby Watts, M.D., 53 FR 11919, 11920 (1988); Frederick Marsh Blanton, M.D., 43 FR at 27617.

According to Pennsylvania statute, "dispense" means "to deliver a controlled substance, other drug or device to an ultimate user or research subject by or pursuant to the lawful order of a practitioner, including the prescribing, administering, packaging, labeling, or compounding necessary to prepare such item for that delivery." 35 Pa. Stat. §?780-102(b) (West 2025). Further, a "practitioner" means "a physician . . . or other person licensed, registered or otherwise permitted to distribute, dispense, conduct research with respect to or to administer a controlled substance, other drug or device in the course of professional practice or research in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania." Id.

Here, the undisputed evidence in the record is that Registrant is not a currently licensed practitioner in Pennsylvania. As discussed above, a physician must be a licensed practitioner to dispense a controlled substance in Pennsylvania. Thus, because Registrant currently lacks authority to practice medicine in Pennsylvania and, therefore, is not currently authorized to handle controlled substances in Pennsylvania, Registrant is not eligible to maintain a DEA registration in Pennsylvania. Accordingly, the Agency will order that Registrant's DEA registration be revoked.

Order

Pursuant to 28 CFR 0.100(b) and the authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C. 824(a), I hereby revoke DEA Certificate of Registration No. FG3991115 issued to Hayriye Gok, M.D. Further, pursuant to 28 CFR 0.100(b) and the authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C. 823(g)(1), I hereby deny any pending applications of Hayriye Gok, M.D., to renew or modify this registration, as well as any other pending application of Hayriye Gok, M.D., for additional registration in Pennsylvania.

This Order is effective August 8, 2025.

Signing Authority

This document of the Drug Enforcement Administration was signed on July 1, 2025, by Acting Administrator Robert J. Murphy. That document with the original signature and date is maintained by DEA. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DEA Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as an official document of DEA. This administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the Federal Register .

Heather Achbach,

Federal Register Liaison Officer, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 2025-12703 Filed 7-8-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P