90 FR 116 pgs. 25874-25883 - Small Business Lending Under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B); Extension of Compliance Dates
Type: RULEVolume: 90Number: 116Pages: 25874 - 25883
Pages: 25874, 25875, 25876, 25877, 25878, 25879, 25880, 25881, 25882, 25883Docket number: [Docket No. CFPB-2025-0017]
FR document: [FR Doc. 2025-11244 Filed 6-17-25; 8:45 am]
Agency: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
[top]
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
12 CFR Part 1002
[Docket No. CFPB-2025-0017]
RIN 3170-AB40
Small Business Lending Under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B); Extension of Compliance Dates
AGENCY:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
ACTION:
Interim final rule, request for public comment.
SUMMARY:
In light of court orders in ongoing litigation, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) is amending Regulation B to extend the compliance dates set forth in its 2023 small business lending rule, as amended by a 2024 interim final rule, and to make other date-related conforming adjustments.
DATES:
This interim final rule is effective July 18, 2025. Comments must be received on or before July 18, 2025.
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CFPB-2025-0017 or RIN 3170-AB40, by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. A brief summary of this document will be available at https://www.regulations.gov/docket/CFPB-2025-0017.
• Email: 2025-IFR-SBLcompliance dates@cfpb.gov. Include Docket No. CFPB-2025-0017 or RIN 3170-AB40 in the subject line of the message.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Comment Intake-Small Business Lending Compliance Dates, c/o Legal Division Docket Manager, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552.
Instructions: The CFPB encourages the early submission of comments. All submissions should include the agency name and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this rulemaking. Because paper mail is subject to delay, commenters are encouraged to submit comments electronically. In general, all comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov.
All submissions, including attachments and other supporting materials, will become part of the public record and subject to public disclosure. Proprietary information or sensitive personal information, such as account numbers or Social Security numbers, or names of other individuals, should not be included. Submissions will not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dave Gettler, Paralegal Specialist, Office of Regulations, at 202-435-7700 or https://reginquiries.consumerfinance.gov/. If you require this document in an alternative electronic format, please contact CFPB_Accessibility@cfpb.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act). Section 1071 of that Act? 1 amended the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA)? 2 to require that financial institutions collect and report to the CFPB certain data regarding applications for credit for women-owned, minority-owned, and small businesses. Section 1071's statutory purposes are to (1) facilitate enforcement of fair lending laws, and (2) enable communities, governmental entities, and creditors to identify business and community development needs and opportunities of women-owned, minority-owned, and small businesses.
Footnotes:
1 ?Public Law 111-203, tit. X, section 1071, 124 Stat. 1376, 2056 (2010), codified at ECOA section 704B, 15 U.S.C. 1691c-2.
2 ?15 U.S.C. 1691 et seq.
Section 1071 directs the CFPB to prescribe such rules and issue such guidance as may be necessary to carry out, enforce, and compile data pursuant to section 1071. On March 30, 2023, the CFPB issued a final rule to implement section 1071 by adding subpart B to Regulation B (2023 final rule). The 2023 final rule was published in the Federal Register on May 31, 2023. 3 Further details about section 1071 and this rulemaking can be found in the preamble to the 2023 final rule. On June 25, 2024, the CFPB issued an interim final rule (2024 interim final rule) to extend the rule's compliance dates in accordance with orders issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. 4 The 2024 interim final rule was published in the Federal Register on July 3, 2024. 5
Footnotes:
3 ?88 FR 35150 (May 31, 2023).
4 ? Texas Bankers Ass'n v. CFPB, No. 7:23-cv-00144 (S.D. Tex.).
5 ?89 FR 55024 (July 3, 2024). See also Order Granting-in-Part and Denying-in-Part Pls.' Mot. for Prelim. Inj., Texas Bankers Ass'n v. CFPB, No. 7:23-cv-00144 (S.D. Tex. July 31, 2023), ECF No. 25, https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_pi_order_texas_bankers.pdf; Order Granting Intervenors' Mots. For Prelim. Inj., Texas Bankers Ass'n v. CFPB, No. 7:23-cv-00144 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2023), ECF No. 69, https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_pi_second_order_texas_bankers.pdf.
[top] Challenges to the 2023 final rule filed by some lenders remain ongoing in three jurisdictions; each of those courts have stayed the rule's compliance deadlines for some market participants. Specifically, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has stayed the rule and tolled the compliance deadlines for plaintiffs and intervenors in that case, until further order of the court. 6 The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky has stayed the deadlines for plaintiffs to comply with the rule until further order of the court. 7 And the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has stayed the rule and tolled the rule's compliance deadlines with
Footnotes:
6 ?Unpublished Order, Texas Bankers Ass'n v. CFPB, No. 24-40705 (5th Cir. Feb. 2, 2025).
7 ?Opinion & Order, Monticello Banking Co. et al. v. CFPB et al., No. 6:23-cv-00148-KKC (E.D. Ky. Mar. 11, 2025).
8 ?Opinion & Order, Revenue Based Finance Coalition v. CFPB et al., No. 1:23-cv-24882-DSL (S.D. Fla. May 6, 2025).
9 ? See Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Stay, ECF No. 75, Revenue Based Finance Coalition v. CFPB et al., No. 1:23-cv-24882-DSL (S.D. Fla. Apr. 3, 2025).
Summary of the Interim Final Rule
In this interim final rule, the CFPB is extending the compliance dates set forth in the 2023 final rule, as amended by the 2024 interim final rule, by approximately one year, and making conforming adjustments. Thus, covered financial institutions must begin collecting data as follows:
| Compliance tier | Original compliance date in the 2023 final rule | Revised compliance date in the 2024 interim final rule | New compliance date | New first filing deadline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highest volume lenders (Tier 1) | October 1, 2024 | July 18, 2025 | July 1, 2026 | June 1, 2027. |
| Moderate volume lenders (Tier 2) | April 1, 2025 | January 16, 2026 | January 1, 2027 | June 1, 2028. |
| Smallest volume lenders (Tier 3) | January 1, 2026 | October 18, 2026 | October 1, 2027 | June 1, 2028. |
Covered financial institutions are permitted to continue using their small business originations from 2022 and 2023 to determine their compliance tier, or they may instead use their originations from 2023 and 2024, or from 2024 and 2025. Covered financial institutions are permitted to begin collecting protected demographic data required under the 2023 final rule 12 months before their new compliance date, in order to test their procedures and systems. As illustrated above, the deadline for submitting small business lending data will remain June 1 following the calendar year for which data are collected. Finally, the CFPB is updating its grace period policy statement to reflect the revised compliance dates.
The CFPB seeks comment on this interim final rule.
II. Legal Authority
The CFPB adopted the 2023 final rule pursuant to its authority under section 1071, which directs the CFPB to adopt rules governing the collection and reporting of small business lending data. Some aspects of the 2023 final rule were also adopted under the CFPB's more general rulemaking authorities in ECOA. The CFPB's legal authorities are discussed in detail in the 2023 final rule. 10
Footnotes:
10 ? See, e.g., 88 FR 35150, 35173-74 (May 31, 2023).
The CFPB is adopting this interim final rule to extend the 2023 final rule's compliance dates, as previously amended by the 2024 interim final rule. ECOA section 704B(g)(1) grants the CFPB general rulemaking authority for section 1071.
III. Administrative Procedure Act
The Administrative Procedure Act does not require notice and opportunity for public comment if an agency for good cause finds that notice and public comment are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. 11 The CFPB finds that prior notice and public comment are unnecessary because this interim final rule addresses compliance date stays issued by three courts for many but not all covered financial institutions and makes other date-related conforming adjustments. Covered financial institutions need to know the new compliance dates promptly so they can appropriately plan their implementation efforts; further delay in finalizing these dates would be contrary to the public interest. The CFPB already solicited and received comment on the substance of the provisions that it is now amending, during its 2020 consultation with representatives of small businesses pursuant to the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, 12 in its 2021 proposed rule, 13 and in its 2024 interim final rule. 14
Footnotes:
11 ?5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
12 ?CFPB, Small Business Advisory Review Panel for Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Small Business Lending Data Collection Rulemaking, Outline of Proposals Under Consideration and Alternatives Considered (Sept. 15, 2020), https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_1071-sbrefa_outline-of-proposals-under-consideration_2020-09.pdf; and CFPB, Final Report of the Small Business Review Panel on the CFPB's Proposals Under Consideration for the Small Business Lending Data Collection Rulemaking (Dec. 14, 2020), https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_1071-sbrefa-report.pdf.
13 ?86 FR 56356 (Oct. 8, 2021).
14 ?89 FR 55024 (July 3, 2024).
IV. Discussion of the Final Rule
As discussed above, three courts have stayed the compliance dates set forth in the 2024 interim final rule for the plaintiffs and intervenors in those cases. However, compliance dates have not been stayed for those who are not plaintiffs or intervenors in those cases. To facilitate consistent compliance across all covered financial institutions, the CFPB is extending the compliance dates set forth in the 2024 interim final rule by approximately one year. The CFPB believes that this length of time should be sufficient to extend beyond the court-ordered stays and for the CFPB to issue a new proposal to reconsider certain aspects of the 2023 final rule.
The CFPB is extending the compliance dates by approximately one year (roughly 350 days), rather than a full year, for the reasons suggested by a commenter on the 2024 interim final rule requesting that the initial compliance dates begin on the first day of a calendar month. The commenter stated that a beginning-of-the-month start date would make the transition to collecting data less burdensome, from an operational and systems perspective. Other stakeholders have similarly requested that data collection commence at the beginning of a calendar quarter. The CFPB agrees that these compliance dates would be sensible. The CFPB is thus adopting new initial compliance dates of July 1, 2026, January 1, 2027, and October 1, 2027.
A. Changes to Compliance Date Provisions
[top] The 2023 final rule's compliance dates, as amended by the 2024 interim final rule, are set forth in §?1002.114(b). That section looks to a financial institution's volume of covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of calendar years 2022 and 2023, or 2023 and 2024, to determine the applicable compliance date. The 2023 final rule, as amended by the 2024 interim final rule, provided that covered financial institutions that originated at
In this interim final rule, the CFPB is extending each of the compliance dates set forth in §?1002.114(b) by approximately one year. Thus, Tier 1 institutions now have a compliance date of July 1, 2026, Tier 2 institutions now have a compliance date of January 1, 2027, and Tier 3 institutions now have a compliance date of October 1, 2027. Likewise, institutions that did not originate at least 100 covered transactions in 2022 and 2023 but subsequently do in two consecutive calendar years are not required to comply with the rule until October 1, 2027 at the earliest. The CFPB is making corresponding updates throughout the commentary accompanying §?1002.114(b) and (c), which provide additional guidance and examples regarding compliance dates.
B. Voluntary Early Collection of Protected Demographic Data
Section 1002.114(c) addresses several transitional issues. Section 1002.114(c)(1) permits a covered financial institution to collect protected demographic information required under the 2023 final rule from small business applicants beginning 12 months prior to its compliance date. As this provision does not list any compliance dates specifically, no revisions are needed. Thus, a Tier 1 institution is permitted to begin collecting protected demographic information on or after July 1, 2025; a Tier 2 institution may begin on or after January 1, 2026; and a Tier 3 institution may begin on or after October 1, 2026, in order to test their procedures and systems for compiling and maintaining this information in advance of actually being required to collect and subsequently report it to the CFPB. 15
Footnotes:
15 ?Under this provision, financial institutions will have time-beginning 12 months prior to their compliance date-to adjust any procedures or systems that may result in the inaccurate compilation or maintenance of applicants' protected demographic information, the collection of which is required by section 1071 but otherwise generally prohibited under ECOA and Regulation B. (Financial institutions could of course collect the other information required by the 2023 final rule at any time, without needing express permission in Regulation B to do so, as is needed for collecting protected demographic information.) See 88 FR 35150, 35449-50 (May 31, 2023).
C. Alternative Period for Counting Covered Originations To Determine Compliance Tier
The CFPB is revising §?1002.114(c)(3) (adopted in the 2024 interim final rule), which now permits (but does not require) a financial institution to use its originations of covered credit transactions in each of calendar years 2023 and 2024, or 2024 and 2025, rather than those in 2022 and 2023, to determine its compliance date. Financial institutions may use whichever set of dates they prefer ( i.e., 2022 and 2023, or 2023 and 2024, or 2024 and 2025). Existing comment 114(b)-4 provides examples illustrating how a financial institution uses its originations in 2022 and 2023, or in 2023 and 2024, to determine its compliance tier.
D. Determining Compliance Dates for Financial Institutions That Do Not Collect Information Sufficient To Determine Small Business Status
Section 1002.114(c)(2) provides that a financial institution that is unable to determine the number of covered credit transactions it originated in 2022 and 2023 for purposes of determining its compliance tier is permitted to use any reasonable method to estimate its originations to small businesses for either or both of 2022 and 2023. Existing comment 114(c)-5 lists several reasonable methods a financial institution may use to estimate its originations.
Pursuant to revised §?1002.114(c)(3), which permits a financial institution to use its originations of covered credit transactions in each of calendar years 2023 and 2024, or 2024 and 2025, to determine its compliance date, financial institutions are likewise permitted to use any reasonable method to estimate their originations for either or both of 2023 and 2024, or 2024 and 2025. Existing comment 114(c)-6 provides examples of ways financial institutions may estimate their originations.
E. Deadline for Annual Data Submissions
Section 1002.109(a)(1) provides that covered financial institutions must submit their small business lending application registers to the CFPB on or before June 1 following the calendar year for which the data are compiled and maintained. As this provision does not list any compliance dates specifically, no revisions are needed. Thus, Tier 1 institutions will make their first data submission by June 1, 2027; Tier 2 and Tier 3 by June 1, 2028.
V. Effective Date
The CFPB is adopting an effective date of 30 days after the publication of this interim final rule in the Federal Register consistent with section 553(d) of the Administrative Procedure Act. 16
Footnotes:
16 ?5 U.S.C. 553(d).
VI. Grace Period Policy Statement
In the 2023 final rule, the CFPB adopted a 12-month grace period during which the CFPB-for covered financial institutions under its supervisory and enforcement jurisdiction-would not intend to assess penalties for errors in data reporting, and would intend to conduct examinations only to diagnose compliance weaknesses, to the extent that these institutions engaged in good faith compliance efforts. The Grace Period Policy Statement set forth in the 2023 final rule explained the CFPB's reasons for adopting such a grace period along with how the CFPB intended to implement such a grace period. 17 The CFPB updated the Grace Period Policy Statement in the 2024 interim final rule. 18 Additionally, on April 30, 2025, the CFPB announced that it will not prioritize enforcement or supervision actions with regard to entities outside the stay imposed by the Fifth Circuit in Texas Bankers Ass'n v. CFPB, discussed in part I above. 19
Footnotes:
17 ? See 88 FR 35150, 35458-59 (May 31, 2023).
18 ?89 FR 55024, 55026 (July 3, 2024).
19 ?CFPB, Press Release, CFPB Keeps Its Enforcement and Supervision Resources Focused on Pressing Threats to Consumers (Apr. 30, 2025), https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/cfpb-keeps-its-enforcement-and-supervision-resources-focused-on-pressing-threats-to-consumers/.
[top] The CFPB is again updating its Grace Period Policy Statement to reflect the new compliance dates set forth in this interim final rule, for the avoidance of any doubt as to its intentions regarding a grace period when the rule goes into effect. 20 The following discussion
Footnotes:
20 ?This is a general statement of policy under the Administrative Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. 553(b). It articulates considerations relevant to the CFPB's exercise of its authorities. It does not impose any legal requirements, nor does it confer rights of any kind. It also does not impose any new or revise any existing recordkeeping, reporting, or disclosure requirements on covered entities or members of the public that would be collections of information requiring approval by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act. 44 U.S.C. 3501 through 3521.
With respect to covered financial institutions subject to the CFPB's supervisory or enforcement jurisdiction that make good faith efforts to comply with the 2023 final rule, the CFPB intends to provide a grace period to reflect the new compliance dates as follows:
| Financial institutions covered by the grace period | Dates covered by the grace period |
|---|---|
| Financial institutions with a compliance date specified in §?1002.114(b)(1) ( i.e., Tier 1 institutions), as well as any financial institutions that make a voluntary submission for the first time for data collected in 2026 | The data collected in 2026 (from July 1, 2026 through December 31, 2026) as well as a portion of data collected in 2027 (from January 1, 2027 through June 30, 2027). |
| Financial institutions with a compliance date specified in §?1002.114(b)(2) ( i.e., Tier 2 institution), as well as any financial institutions that make a voluntary submission for the first time for data collected in 2027 | The data collected in 2027 (from January 1, 2027 through December 31, 2027). |
| Financial institutions with a compliance date specified in §?1002.114(b)(3) ( i.e., Tier 3 institution), as well as any financial institutions that make a voluntary submission for the first time for data collected in 2028 | The data collected in 2027 (from October 1, 2027 through December 31, 2027) as well as a portion of data collected in 2028 (from January 1, 2028 through September 30, 2028). |
As discussed in the 2023 final rule and the 2024 interim final rule, the CFPB believes that a 12-month grace period for each compliance tier will give institutions time to diagnose and address unintentional errors without the prospect of penalties for inadvertent compliance issues, and may ultimately assist other covered financial institutions, especially those in later compliance tiers, in identifying best practices. The CFPB views this grace period as enabling deliberate and thoughtful compliance with the rule, while still providing important data regarding small business lending as soon as is practical.
During the grace period, if the CFPB identifies errors in a financial institution's initial data submissions, it does not intend to require data resubmission unless data errors are material. Further, the CFPB does not intend to assess penalties with respect to unintentional and good faith errors in the initial data submissions. Any examinations of these initial data submissions will be diagnostic and will help to identify compliance weaknesses. However, errors that are not the result of good faith compliance efforts by financial institutions, especially attempts to discourage applicants from providing data, will remain subject to the CFPB's supervisory and enforcement authority.
The CFPB believes that the grace period covering the initial data submissions will provide financial institutions an opportunity to identify any gaps in their implementation of the 2023 final rule and make improvements in their compliance management systems for future data submissions. In addition, a grace period will permit the CFPB to help financial institutions identify errors and, thereby, self-correct to avoid such errors in the future. The CFPB can also use data collected during the grace period to alert financial institutions of common errors and potential best practices in data collection and submissions under the rule.
VII. CFPA Section 1022(b) Analysis
A. Overview
In developing this interim final rule, the CFPB has considered the potential benefits, costs, and impacts as required by section 1022(b)(2) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA). 21 Section 1022(b)(2) calls for the CFPB to consider the potential benefits and costs of a regulation to consumers and covered persons, including the potential reduction of consumer access to consumer financial products or services, the impact on depository institutions and credit unions with $10 billion or less in total assets as described in section 1026 of the CFPA, and the impact on consumers in rural areas. In addition, section 1022(b)(2)(B) directs the CFPB to consult with appropriate prudential regulators or other Federal agencies, regarding consistency with the objectives those agencies administer. The CFPB has accordingly consulted with the appropriate prudential regulators and other Federal agencies regarding consistency with any prudential, market, or systemic objectives administered by these agencies.
Footnotes:
21 ?12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(2).
In this interim final rule, the CFPB is extending by approximately one year the compliance dates set forth in the 2023 final rule, as amended by the 2024 interim final rule, and making several conforming adjustments. Thus, covered financial institutions with the highest volume of small business originations (Tier 1) must begin collecting data by July 1, 2026; moderate-volume institutions (Tier 2) by January 1, 2027; and the smallest volume institutions (Tier 3) by October 1, 2027. Covered financial institutions are permitted to continue using their small business originations from 2022 and 2023 to determine their compliance tier, or instead they may use their originations from 2023 and 2024, or 2024 and 2025.
The CFPB expects covered institutions to benefit from the extension of the compliance dates, but expects that the impacts of this interim final rule on covered institutions will be small relative to the overall impacts of the 2023 final rule, as amended by the 2024 interim final rule, that it modifies. The CFPB additionally expects this interim final rule to have minimal impacts on small businesses, due to the long-term nature of the benefits of the 2023 final rule and an expectation that the 2023 final rule will have a limited effect on the cost of small business credit.
B. Data Limitation and Quantification of Benefits, Costs, and Impacts
[top] The discussion below relies on information the CFPB has obtained from industry, other regulatory agencies, and publicly available sources. The CFPB provides estimates, to the extent possible, of the potential benefits, costs, and impacts to consumers and covered persons of this interim final rule given the limitations of available data.
To estimate the number of depository institutions covered by the interim final rule, the CFPB relies in part on data from publicly available sources, such as the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council's Reports on Condition of Income (Call Reports), the National Credit Union Administration's Call Reports, and data reported under the Community Reinvestment Act. As described in detail in part IX.E of the 2023 final rule, information on the cost of compliance is derived from the CFPB's previous Home Mortgage Disclosure Act rulemaking activities and a One-time Cost Survey the CFPB administered in 2020 as part of its small business lending rule development process.
There are limitations, such as limited comprehensive data on non-depository institutions potentially subject to the 2023 final rule and thus this interim final rule, and limited data on which to quantify benefits of the interim final rule with precision. The CFPB supplements the data sources described above with general economic principles and the CFPB's expertise in consumer financial markets. The CFPB qualitatively describes potential benefits, costs, and impacts where the ability to provide quantitative estimates are impacted by these limitations.
C. Baseline for Analysis
In evaluating the potential benefits, costs, and impacts of this interim final rule, the CFPB takes as a baseline Regulation B as amended by the 2023 final rule and the 2024 interim final rule. Part IV above summarizes the provisions of the 2023 final rule, as amended by the 2024 interim final rule, that are being revised (again) in this interim final rule. The CFPB's analysis of the potential costs, benefits, and impacts of this interim final rule are relative to the compliance dates from the 2024 interim final rule and other requirements of the 2023 final rule.
D. Potential Benefits and Costs to Covered Persons and Small Businesses
1. Potential Benefits and Costs to Covered Persons
Based on the methodology used to determine coverage in the 2023 final rule, 22 the CFPB expects about 100 financial institutions to be required to report in Tier 1, about 450 to be required to report in Tier 2, and about 2,000 to be required to report in Tier 3.
Footnotes:
22 ?The CFPB continues to use the estimates from the 2023 final rule, which are based on data from 2017 through 2019.
By extending the compliance dates by approximately one year for all covered institutions, financial institutions will benefit by the delay in the expected costs of compliance with the 2023 final rule. The benefit from the compliance date extension will differ depending on whether the cost was expected to be "one-time" or "ongoing." Part IX.E of the 2023 final rule described two categories of cost that the CFPB expected covered financial institutions to incur. "One-time" costs refer to expenses that the financial institution will incur initially and only once to implement changes required to comply with the requirements of the rule. "Ongoing" costs are expenses incurred because of the ongoing reporting requirements of the rule, accrued on an annual basis.
The CFPB expects covered financial institutions to experience an annual ongoing cost of compliance in perpetuity. Therefore, extending the compliance dates potentially saves financial institutions approximately one year's worth of expected annual compliance costs. In the 2023 rule, the CFPB detailed its methodology and estimates of this annual ongoing cost for institutions of different levels of complexity in their processes for collecting, checking, and reporting data on applications for small business credit. These "types" were Type A (least complex), Type B (medium complexity), and Type C (most complex) and were related to small business credit application volume. The 2023 final rule gave estimates of compliance costs for representative institutions of each type as well as the market-level estimate for all complying institutions. The CFPB estimated that, per application for small business credit, Type A institutions would incur $83 in annual ongoing costs, Type B institutions would incur $100, and Type C institutions would incur $46.
The CFPB has estimated that about 100 financial institutions will be required to report in Tier 1, about 450 will be required to report in Tier 2, and about 2,000 will be required to report in Tier 3. The CFPB assumes that ongoing costs savings will be evenly spread over the months of the year. Thus, half of ongoing cost savings for Tier 1 will occur in 2025 and half will occur in 2026, that all the ongoing costs savings for Tier 2 will occur in 2026, and that Tier 3 will observe one sixth of ongoing cost savings in 2026 and five sixth of ongoing cost savings in 2027. Based on these assumptions, per application cost estimates, and the CFPB's estimated application volumes for all institutions, the expected cost savings will be about $92 million in 2025, about $190 million in 2026, and about $75 million in 2027, not accounting for discounting for future years. The present discounted value of the total cost savings, discounting back to 2024, is about $313 million using a 3 percent discount rate or about $337 million using a 7 percent discount rate. 23 Further amortizing these savings over three years implies an annualized cost savings of about $119 million using either a 3 percent or a 7 percent discount rate.
Footnotes:
23 ?We calculate these numbers primarily for the purpose of accounting for savings under Executive Order 14192. To make rules issued in different years readily comparable, accounting under Executive Order 14192 uses discounting relative to a common year, 2024.
This interim final rule does not change the nominal value of the one-time costs that will be incurred by covered institutions but does potentially delay the realization of those costs approximately one year into the future for institutions in each compliance tier. Thus, the new one-time costs are the baseline one-time costs discounted by approximately one year to the extent they have not already been incurred. The present value of the benefit associated with the interim final rule's impact on one-time costs is the difference between the baseline one-time costs and the new discounted costs. The CFPB lacks data to quantify the extent to which one-time costs will be delayed by this rule.
The CFPB additionally expects that the compliance date extension and the associated flexibility in years of origination data that can be used to determine coverage would confer a benefit to covered institutions with the additional time to prepare for compliance relative to the baseline.
With the extension of the compliance dates by approximately one year, this interim final rule delays the realization of these potential benefits to covered financial institutions. As enumerated in the 2023 final rule, benefits include more efficient fair lending review prioritization by regulators and the institutions' own use of small business lending data to better understand small business credit demand and the supply by their competitors.
2. Potential Benefits and Costs to Small Businesses
[top] As with the 2023 final rule, this interim final rule will not directly impact consumers, as that term is defined by the Dodd-Frank Act. Some consumers will be impacted in their separate capacity as sole owners of small businesses covered by the rule. The CFPB has elected to consider the costs to small businesses from this
In part IX.F of the 2023 final rule, the CFPB described how small businesses would benefit from the impact of the rule on the enforcement of fair lending laws and on community development. In an environment with limited data sources on small business credit, the CFPB expects data collected under the rule to enable communities, governmental entities, and creditors to identify business and community development needs and opportunities for women-owned, minority-owned, and small businesses. The CFPB also expects data collected under the 2023 final rule to facilitate fair lending enforcement by Federal, State, and local enforcement agencies. Due to limitations on data and methodology, the CFPB mostly described these benefits qualitatively.
To the extent small businesses benefit in the above ways from the 2023 final rule, the extension of the compliance dates reduces the benefits accruing to small businesses by delaying the realization of these benefits. While compliance dates are extended by approximately one year, covered financial institutions will be required to file data one year later than expected under the 2024 interim final rule ( i.e., Tier 1 by June 1, 2027 rather than June 1, 2026 and Tiers 2 and 3 by June 1, 2028 rather than June 1, 2027). The CFPB expects that the benefits of the 2023 final rule will primarily begin with the publication of the data. Thus, small businesses' and financial institutions' realizations of the benefits arising from the 2023 final rule will likewise be delayed by at least one year, reducing the real net present value of these expected future benefits. The CFPB is unable to readily quantify the costs associated with delaying future benefits because the CFPB does not have the data to quantify all the benefits of the 2023 final rule.
The 2023 final rule also described that the CFPB expects financial institutions to pass on a portion of their annual ongoing costs to small business borrowers in the form of higher rates or fees. While, in general, the CFPB expects the magnitude of any pass-through to be a small portion of the total cost of the average loan to a small business applicant, extended compliance dates could benefit small business borrowers by delaying these increased costs.
3. Distribution of Small Business Impacts
The differences in the impacts of this interim final rule between different types of small businesses is likely to be small with approximately one year added to each of the compliance dates. Most of the distribution of benefits and costs are likely to be derived from whether small businesses are serviced by lenders in different compliance tiers and the difference in present discounted values.
E. Potential Impacts on Depository Institutions and Credit Unions With $10 Billion or Less in Total Assets, as Described in CFPA Section 1026
Using the methodology described in the 2023 final rule, the CFPB estimates that between 1,700 and 1,900 banks, savings associations, and credit unions with $10 billion or less in total assets will be affected by this interim final rule. The CFPB believes that the impacts of the interim final rule on these small depository institutions will be similar to those impacts on covered financial institutions as a whole, discussed above. These institutions would incur benefits from approximately one year in annual ongoing costs and the postponement of approximately one year of one-time costs. They would also potentially benefit from additional time to develop software and other resources used to comply with the 2023 final rule.
F. Potential Impacts on Small Businesses' Access to Credit and on Small Businesses in Rural Areas
The CFPB does not expect this interim final rule to have a significant impact on small businesses' access to credit. In the 2023 final rule, the CFPB described how the likeliest effect of the rule on access to credit would be a small increase in interest rates or fees. This interim final rule shifts this potential effect by approximately one year without any additional provisions that would affect credit access.
In part IX.H of the 2023 final rule, the CFPB described how existing data sources limited its ability to precisely estimate the number of financial institutions who serve rural areas who are covered under the 2023 final rule. The CFPB expects that 65 to 70 percent of rural bank and savings associations branches and 14 percent of rural credit union branches would be affected by this interim final rule using the methodology set forth in the 2023 final rule.
Small businesses in rural areas are expected to experience similar costs and benefits of small businesses more broadly. Small businesses in rural areas would experience a reduction in benefits via a postponement of the benefits of the 2023 final rule on fair lending enforcement and community development. These small businesses would also experience a benefit by the postponement of expected small increases in interest rates and fees.
VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not require an initial or final regulatory flexibility analysis in a rulemaking where a general notice of proposed rulemaking is not required. 24 As discussed in part III above, the CFPB has determined that prior notice and comment is unnecessary for this interim final rule. As an additional basis, the CFPB's Acting Director certifies that this interim final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, and so an initial or final regulatory flexibility analysis is also not required for that reason. 25 The rule will not impose significant costs on creditors, including small entities, for the reasons described in the section 1022(b) analysis in part VII above.
Footnotes:
24 ?5 U.S.C. 603(a), 604(a).
25 ?5 U.S.C. 605(b).
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Federal agencies are generally required to seek approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for information collection requirements prior to implementation. Under the PRA, the CFPB may not conduct or sponsor, and, notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person is not required to respond to an information collection unless the information collection displays a valid control number assigned by OMB. The interim final rule amends 12 CFR part 1002 (Regulation B), which implements the small business lending rule. The CFPB's OMB control number for Regulation B is 3170-0013; its current expiration date is August 31, 2025.
The interim final rule does not add to or change the collection requirements of the 2023 final rule; rather, it only changes the initial compliance dates and makes other date-related conforming adjustments. The CFPB has therefore determined that the interim final rule does not contain any new or substantively revised information collection requirements as defined by the PRA.
X. Congressional Review Act
[top] Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq. ), the CFPB will submit a report containing this interim final rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the
Footnotes:
26 ?5 U.S.C. 805(2).
XI. Regulatory Review
Under Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14215 to cover the CFPB, OIRA has deemed the regulatory action to be "economically significant." This action is considered an Executive Order 14192 deregulatory action. For the purposes of Executive Order 14192, we estimate annualized cost savings over a perpetual time horizon, discounted to the year 2024, to make impacts more comparable with other rules. Thus, we estimate that this rule will generate $20.5 million in annualized costs savings, assuming a 7 percent discount rate and accounting for the lack of savings in 2024.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1002
Banks, Banking, Civil rights, Consumer protection, Credit, Credit unions, Marital status discrimination, National banks, Penalties.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the CFPB amends Regulation B, 12 CFR part 1002, as follows:
PART 1002-EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITY ACT (REGULATION B)
1. The authority citation for part 1002 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
12 U.S.C. 5512, 5581; 15 U.S.C. 1691b. Subpart B is also issued under 15 U.S.C. 1691c-2.
2. Section 1002.114 is amended by:
a. In paragraph (b)(1), removing "July 18, 2025" and adding in its place "July 1, 2026";
b. In paragraph (b)(2), removing "January 16, 2026" and adding in its place "January 1, 2027";
c. In paragraphs (b)(3) and (4), removing "October 18, 2026" and adding in its place "October 1, 2027"; and
d. Revising paragraph (c)(3).
The revision reads as follows:
§?1002.114 Effective date, compliance date, and special transitional rules.
(c) * * *
(3) Alternative time period for determining compliance dates. A financial institution is permitted to use its originations of covered credit transactions in each of calendar years 2023 and 2024, or 2024 and 2025, in lieu of calendar years 2022 and 2023 as specified in paragraphs (b) and (c)(2) of this section.
3. In supplement I to part 1002, under Section 1002.114-Effective Date, Compliance Date, and Special Transition Rules, revise 114(b) Compliance Date and 114(c) Special Transition Rules to read as follows:
Supplement I to Part 1002-Official Interpretations
Section 1002.114-Effective Date, Compliance Date, and Special Transition Rules
114(b) Compliance Date
1. Application of compliance date. The applicable compliance date in §?1002.114(b) is the date by which the covered financial institution must begin to compile data as specified in §?1002.107, comply with the firewall requirements of §?1002.108, and begin to maintain records as specified in §?1002.111. In addition, the covered financial institution must comply with §?1002.110(c) and (d) no later than June 1 of the year after the applicable compliance date. For instance, if §?1002.114(b)(2) applies to a financial institution, it must comply with §§?1002.107 and 1002.108, and portions of §?1002.111, beginning January 1, 2027, and it must comply with §?1002.110(c) and (d), and portions of §?1002.111, no later than June 1, 2028.
2. Initial collections pursuant to §?1002.114(b). i. When the compliance date of July 1, 2026, specified in §?1002.114(b)(1) applies to a covered financial institution, the financial institution is required to collect data for covered applications during the period from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026. The financial institution must compile data for this period pursuant to §?1002.107, comply with the firewall requirements of §?1002.108, and maintain records as specified in §?1002.111. In addition, for data collected during this period, the covered financial institution must comply with §§?1002.109 and 1002.110(c) and (d) by June 1, 2027.
ii. When the compliance date of January 1, 2027, specified in §?1002.114(b)(2) applies to a covered financial institution, the financial institution is required to collect data for covered applications during the period from January 1, 2027, to December 31, 2027. The financial institution must compile data for this period pursuant to §?1002.107, comply with the firewall requirements of §?1002.108, and maintain records as specified in §?1002.111. In addition, for data collected during this period, the covered financial institution must comply with §§?1002.109 and 1002.110(c) and (d) by June 1, 2028.
iii. When the compliance date of October 1, 2027, specified in §?1002.114(b)(3) or (4) applies to a covered financial institution, the financial institution is required to collect data for covered applications during the period from October 1, 2027, to December 31, 2027. The financial institution must compile data for this period pursuant to §?1002.107, comply with the firewall requirements of §?1002.108, and maintain records as specified in §?1002.111. In addition, for data collected during this period, the covered financial institution must comply with §§?1002.109 and 1002.110(c) and (d) by June 1, 2028.
3. Informal names for compliance date provisions. To facilitate discussion of the compliance dates specified in §?1002.114(b)(1), (2), and (3), in the official commentary and any other documents referring to these compliance dates, the Bureau adopts the following informal simplified names. Tier 1 refers to the cohort of covered financial institutions that have a compliance date of July 1, 2026, pursuant to §?1002.114(b)(1). Tier 2 refers to the cohort of covered financial institutions that have a compliance date of January 1, 2027, pursuant to §?1002.114(b)(2). Tier 3 refers to the cohort of covered financial institutions that have a compliance date of October 1, 2027, pursuant to §?1002.114(b)(3).
4. Examples. The following scenarios illustrate how to determine whether a financial institution is a covered financial institution and which compliance date specified in §?1002.114(b) applies. Unless otherwise indicated, in each example the financial institution has chosen to use its originations in 2022 and 2023 (rather than 2023 and 2024, or 2024 and 2025, as permitted by §?1002.114(c)(3)) to determine its initial compliance tier.
i. Financial Institution A originated 3,000 covered credit transactions for small businesses in calendar year 2022, and 3,000 in calendar year 2023. Financial Institution A is in Tier 1 and has a compliance date of July 1, 2026.
[top] ii. Financial Institution B originated 2,000 covered credit transactions for small businesses in calendar year 2022,
iii. Financial Institution C originated 400 covered credit transactions to small businesses in calendar year 2022, and 1,000 in calendar year 2023. Because Financial Institution C did not originate at least 2,500 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of 2022 and 2023, it is not in Tier 1, and because it did not originate at least 500 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of 2022 and 2023, it is not in Tier 2. Because Financial Institution C did originate at least 100 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of 2022 and 2023, it is in Tier 3 and has a compliance date of October 1, 2027.
iv. Financial Institution D originated 90 covered credit transactions to small businesses in calendar year 2022, 120 in calendar year 2023, and 90 in calendar years 2024, 2025, 2026, and 2027. Because Financial Institution D did not originate at least 100 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of 2022 and 2023, it is not in Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3. Because Financial Institution D did not originate at least 100 covered credit transactions for small businesses in subsequent consecutive calendar years, it is not a covered financial institution under §?1002.105(b) and is not required to comply with the rule in 2026, 2027, or 2028.
v. Financial Institution E originated 120 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of calendar years 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, and 90 in 2026. Because Financial Institution E did not originate at least 2,500 or 500 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of 2022 and 2023, it is not in Tier 1 or Tier 2. Because Financial Institution E originated at least 100 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of 2022 and 2023, it is in Tier 3 and has a compliance date of October 1, 2027. However, because Financial Institution E did not originate at least 100 covered credit transactions for small businesses in both 2025 and 2026, it no longer satisfies the definition of a covered financial institution in §?1002.105(b) at the time of the compliance date for Tier 3 institutions and thus is not required to comply with the rule in 2027.
vi. Financial Institution F originated 90 covered credit transactions for small businesses in calendar year 2022, and 120 in 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026. Because Financial Institution F did not originate at least 100 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of 2022 and 2023, it is not in Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3. Because Financial Institution F originated at least 100 covered credit transactions for small businesses in subsequent calendar years, §?1002.114(b)(4), which cross-references §?1002.105(b), applies to Financial Institution F. Because Financial Institution F originated at least 100 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of 2025 and 2026, it is a covered financial institution under §?1002.105(b) and is required to comply with the rule beginning October 1, 2027. Alternatively, if Financial Institution F chooses to use its originations in calendar years 2023 and 2024 (or 2024 and 2025) to determine its compliance tier pursuant to §?1002.114(c)(3), it would be in Tier 3 and likewise required to comply with the rule beginning October 1, 2027.
vii. Financial Institution G originated 90 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of calendar years 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, and 2027, and 120 in each of 2028 and 2029. Because Financial Institution F did not originate at least 100 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of 2022 and 2023, it is not in Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3. Because Financial Institution G originated at least 100 covered credit transactions for small businesses in subsequent calendar years, §?1002.114(b)(4), which cross-references §?1002.105(b), applies to Financial Institution G. Because Financial Institution G originated at least 100 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of 2028 and 2029, it is a covered financial institution under §?1002.105(b) and is required to comply with the rule beginning January 1, 2030.
viii. Financial Institution H originated 550 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of calendar years 2022 and 2023, 450 in 2024, and 550 in 2025 and 2026. Because Financial Institution H originated at least 500 covered credit transactions for small businesses in each of 2022 and 2023, it would be in Tier 2 and have a compliance date of January 1, 2027. However, §?1002.114(c)(3) permits financial institutions to use their originations in 2023 and 2024 (or 2024 and 2025), rather than in 2022 and 2023, to determine compliance tier. If Financial Institution H elects to use its originations in 2023 and 2024, it would be in Tier 3 and required to comply with the rule beginning October 1, 2027.
114(c) Special Transition Rules
1. Collection of certain information prior to a financial institution's compliance date. Notwithstanding §?1002.5(a)(4)(ix), a financial institution that chooses to collect information on covered applications as permitted by §?1002.114(c)(1) in the 12 months prior to its initial compliance date as specified in §?1002.114(b)(1), (2) or (3) need comply only with the requirements set out in §§?1002.107(a)(18) and (19), 1002.108, and 1002.111(b) and (c) with respect to the information collected. During this 12-month period, a covered financial institution need not comply with the provisions of §?1002.107 (other than §§?1002.107(a)(18) and (19)), §?1002.109, §?1002.110, §?1002.111(a), or §?1002.114.
2. Transition rule for applications received prior to a compliance date but final action is taken after a compliance date. If a covered financial institution receives a covered application from a small business prior to its initial compliance date specified in §?1002.114(b), but takes final action on or after that date, the financial institution is not required to collect data regarding that application pursuant to §?1002.107 nor to report the application pursuant to §?1002.109. For example, if a financial institution is subject to a compliance date of July 1, 2026, and it receives an application on June 27, 2026, but does not take final action on the application until July 25, 2026, the financial institution is not required to collect data pursuant to §?1002.107 nor to report data to the Bureau pursuant to §?1002.109 regarding that application.
3. Has readily accessible the information needed to determine small business status. A financial institution has readily accessible the information needed to determine whether its originations of covered credit transactions were for small businesses as defined in §?1002.106 if, for instance, it in the ordinary course of business collects data on the precise gross annual revenue of the businesses for which it originates loans, it obtains information sufficient to determine whether an applicant for business credit had gross annual revenues of $5 million or less, or if it collects and reports similar data to Federal or State government agencies pursuant to other laws or regulations.
[top] 4. Does not have readily accessible the information needed to determine small business status. A financial institution does not have readily accessible the information needed to determine whether its originations of covered credit transactions were for small businesses as defined in §?1002.106 if it
5. Reasonable method to estimate the number of originations. The reasonable methods that financial institutions may use to estimate originations for 2022 and 2023 (or for 2023 and 2024, or 2024 and 2025, pursuant to §?1002.114(c)(3)) include, but are not limited to, the following:
i. A financial institution may comply with §?1002.114(c)(2) by determining the small business status of covered credit transactions by asking every applicant, prior to the closing of approved transactions, to self-report whether it had gross annual revenue for its preceding fiscal year of $5 million or less, during the period October 1 through December 31, 2023. The financial institution may annualize the number of covered credit transactions it originates to small businesses from October 1 through December 31, 2023, by quadrupling the originations for this period, and apply the annualized number of originations to both calendar years 2022 and 2023. Pursuant to §?1002.114(c)(3), a financial institution is permitted to use its originations in 2023 and 2024 (or 2024 and 2025), rather than 2022 and 2023, to determine its compliance tier. Thus, for example, a financial institution may ask applicants to self-report revenue information during the period of October 1 through December 31, 2024, and then may annualize the number of covered credit transactions it originated to small businesses during that period and apply the annualized number of originations to both calendar years 2023 and 2024.
ii. A financial institution may comply with §?1002.114(c)(2) by assuming that every covered credit transaction it originates for business customers in calendar years 2022 and 2023 (or in 2023 and 2024, or 2024 and 2025) is to a small business.
iii. A financial institution may comply with §?1002.114(c)(2) by using another methodology provided that such methodology is reasonable and documented in writing.
6. Examples. The following scenarios illustrate the potential application of §?1002.114(c)(2) to a financial institution's compliance date under §?1002.114(b). Unless otherwise indicated, in each example the financial institution has chosen to estimate its originations for 2022 and 2023 (rather than 2023 and 2024 or 2024 or 2025 as permitted by §?1002.114(c)(3)) to determine its initial compliance tier.
i. Prior to October 1, 2023, Financial Institution A did not collect gross annual revenue or other information that would allow it to determine the small business status of the businesses for whom it originated covered credit transactions in calendar years 2022 and 2023. Financial Institution A chose to use the methodology set out in comment 114(c)-5.i and as of October 1, 2023, began to collect information on gross annual revenue as defined in §?1002.107(a)(14) for its covered credit transactions originated for businesses. Using this information, Financial Institution A determined that it had originated 750 covered credit transactions for businesses that were small as defined in §?1002.106. On an annualized basis, Financial Institution A originated 3,000 covered credit transactions for small businesses (750 originations * 4 = 3,000 originations per year). Applying this annualized figure of 3,000 originations to both calendar years 2022 and 2023, Financial Institution A is in Tier 1 and has a compliance date of July 1, 2026.
ii. Prior to July 1, 2023, Financial Institution B collected gross annual revenue information for some applicants for business credit, but such information was only noted in its paper loan files. Financial Institution B thus does not have reasonable access to information that would allow it to determine the small business status of the businesses for whom it originated covered credit transactions for calendar years 2022 and 2023. Financial Institution B chose to use the methodology set out in comment 114(c)-5.i, and as of October 1, 2023, Financial Institution B began to ask all businesses for whom it was closing covered credit transactions if they had gross annual revenues in the preceding fiscal year of $5 million or less. Using this information, Financial Institution B determined that it had originated 350 covered credit transactions for businesses that were small as defined in §?1002.106. On an annualized basis, Financial Institution B originated 1,400 covered credit transactions for small businesses (350 originations * 4 = 1,400 originations per year). Applying this estimated figure of 1,400 originations to both calendar years 2022 and 2023, Financial Institution B is in Tier 2 and has a compliance date of January 1, 2027.
iii. Prior to April 1, 2023, Financial Institution C did not collect gross annual revenue or other information that would allow it to determine the small business status of the businesses for whom it originated covered credit transactions in calendar years 2022 and 2023. Financial Institution C chose its own methodology pursuant to comment 114(c)-5.iii, basing it in part on the methodology specified in comment 114(c)-5.i. Starting on April 1, 2023, Financial Institution C began to ask all business applicants for covered credit transactions if they had gross annual revenue in their preceding fiscal year of $5 million or less. Using this information, Financial Institution C determined that it had originated 100 covered credit transactions for businesses that were small as defined in §?1002.106. On an annualized basis, Financial Institution C originated approximately 133 covered credit transactions for small businesses ((100 originations * 365 days)/275 days = 132.73 originations per year). Applying this estimate of 133 originations to both calendar years 2022 and 2023, Financial Institution C is in Tier 3 and has a compliance date of October 1, 2027.
iv. Financial Institution D did not collect gross annual revenue or other information that would allow it to determine the small business status of the businesses for whom it originated covered credit transactions in calendar years 2022 and 2023. Financial Institution D determined that it had originated 3,000 total covered credit transactions for businesses in each of 2022 and 2023. Applying the methodology specified in comment 114(c)-5.ii, Financial Institution D assumed that all 3,000 covered credit transactions originated in each of 2022 and 2023 were to small businesses. On that basis, Financial Institution D is in Tier 1 and has a compliance date of July 1, 2026.
[top] v. Financial Institution E did not collect gross annual revenue or other information that would allow it to determine the small business status of the businesses for whom it originated covered credit transactions in calendar years 2022 and 2023. Financial Institution E determined that it had originated 700 total covered credit transactions for businesses in each of 2022 and 2023. Applying the
vi. Financial Institution F does not have readily accessible gross annual revenue or other information that would allow it to determine the small business status of the businesses for whom it originated covered credit transactions in calendar years 2022 and 2023. Financial Institution F determined that it had originated 80 total covered credit transactions for businesses in 2022 and 150 total covered credit transactions for businesses in 2023. Applying the methodology set out in comment 114(c)-5.ii, Financial Institution F assumed that all such transactions originated in 2022 and 2023 were originated for small businesses. On that basis, Financial Institution E is not in Tier 1, Tier 2 or Tier 3, and is subject to the compliance date provision specified in §?1002.114(b)(4).
vii. Financial Institution G does not have readily accessible gross annual revenue or other information that would allow it to determine the small business status of the businesses for whom it originated covered credit transactions in calendar years 2022, 2023, 2024, or 2025. Financial Institution G chose to use the methodology set out in comment 114(c)-5.i, and as of October 1, 2025, Financial Institution G began to ask all businesses for whom it was closing covered credit transactions if they had gross annual revenue in the preceding fiscal year of $5 million or less. Using this information, Financial Institution G determined that it had originated 700 covered credit transactions during that period for businesses that were small as defined in §?1002.106. On an annualized basis, Financial Institution G originated 2,800 covered credit transactions for small businesses (700 originations * 4 = 2,800 originations per year). Applying this estimated figure of 2,800 originations to both calendar years 2024 and 2025, Financial Institution G is in Tier 1 and has a compliance date of July 1, 2026.
Russell Vought,
Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2025-11244 Filed 6-17-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P