90 FR 113 pgs. 25107-25111 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Implement a Supplemental Equity Rights Program
Type: NOTICEVolume: 90Number: 113Pages: 25107 - 25111
Pages: 25107, 25108, 25109, 25110, 25111Docket number: [Release No. 34-103210; File No. SR-MEMX-2025-14]
FR document: [FR Doc. 2025-10746 Filed 6-12-25; 8:45 am]
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
[top]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-103210; File No. SR-MEMX-2025-14]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Implement a Supplemental Equity Rights Program
June 9, 2025.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice is hereby given that on May 29, 2025, MEMX LLC ("MEMX" or the "Exchange") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
Footnotes:
1 ?15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 ?17 CFR 240.19b-4.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposed rule change to implement an equity rights program (the "Supplemental Warrants Program") that is supplemental to the Exchange's existing equity rights program related to fees charged for the trading of options on the Exchange's options platform ("MEMX Options"). The Exchange proposes to implement the changes to the Fee Schedule pursuant to this proposal immediately.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to implement the Supplemental Warrants Program as a supplement to the Exchange's existing equity rights program, which was implemented on May 1, 2024 (the "Original Warrants Program"). 3 Under the Supplemental Warrants Program, warrants representing the right to acquire equity in the Exchange's parent holding company upon vesting would be issued to participants on MEMX Options who currently participate in the Original Warrants Program and who elect to also participate in the Supplemental Warrants Program ("Participants"), in exchange for payment of the initial prepayment fee ("Prepayment Fee") and the achievement of certain liquidity volume thresholds on MEMX Options over a 12-month period (the "Term"). The Supplemental Warrants Program will commence on June 1, 2025 (the "Effective Date") and will end on June 1, 2026.
Footnotes:
3 ? See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100247 (May 30, 2024), 89 FR 48203 (June 5, 2024) (SR-MEMX-2024-21).
The Supplemental Warrants Program will be administered in the same manner as the Exchange's Original Warrants Program except it will have a different Term and different volume requirements for the vesting of warrants, as described below. All other terms and conditions of the Supplemental Warrants Program will be substantially similar to those of the Original Warrants Program, with any substantive differences described below. Like that of the Original Warrants Program, the purpose of the Supplemental Warrants Program is to promote the long-term interests of MEMX by providing incentives designed to encourage MEMX market participants to contribute to the growth and success of MEMX Options via actively providing and taking liquidity on the MEMX Options market. Participants in the Supplemental Warrants Program will be able to vest their warrants through the process described in the following paragraphs and consequently will have the opportunity to share in the benefits of MEMX's increased enterprise value.
[top] Participants who executed a Purchase Agreement and who provide a Prepayment Fee in the amount of $500,000 in advance of May 28, 2025 (the "Commitment Deadline") or such later date specified by the Exchange will be issued a "ticket" indicating that the Participant has been accepted into the Supplemental Warrants Program. Each Participant may only purchase one ticket under the Supplemental Warrants Program, and the total number of tickets available for purchase under the Supplemental Warrants Program is capped at five (5) tickets. 4 Upon making the Prepayment Fee, a Participant will be able to apply the Prepayment Fee to various fees for trading on MEMX Options, including MEMX Options connectivity fees, 5 MEMX Options market data fees, 6 MEMX Options
Footnotes:
4 ?The Exchange notes that this aspect of the Supplemental Warrants Program differs from the Original Warrants Program, which was capped at 25 tickets and participants could purchase multiple tickets thereunder.
5 ? See the MEMX Connectivity Fee Schedule, available at https://info.memxtrading.com/connectivity-fees/.
6 ? See the MEMX Options Fee Schedule, available at https://info.memxtrading.com/us-options-trading-resources/us-options-fee-schedule/.
7 ? See the MEMX Membership Fee Schedule, available at https://info.memxtrading.com/membership-fees/.
8 ? See the MEMX Options Fee Schedule, available at https://info.memxtrading.com/us-options-trading-resources/us-options-fee-schedule/.
9 ?The Exchange notes that participants under the Original Warrants Program obtained 279,600 warrants per ticket, but the term of the Original Warrants Program was 24 months, so the same number of warrants per ticket (139,800) were eligible to vest every 12 months.
Participants shall vest warrants on a pro-rata basis based upon meeting or outperforming volume commitments during each Measurement Period, as is discussed below. The volume commitments may be met by trading activity in any listed equity option or exchange-traded fund option on MEMX Options. 10 Participants that trade options which are not in the Penny Program? 11 (such options, "Non-Penny" options) will receive double credit for such Non-Penny activity for purposes of calculating the Participant's performance during the Measurement Period. Each vested warrant entitles a Participant to purchase equity ownership of one Nonvoting Common Unit? 12 of Holdco at a particular strike price. Only vested warrants are eligible to be exercised, and un-vested warrants are not exercisable. The total equity ownership of Holdco Units, including any purchased through the exercise of vested warrants, shall be subject to the ownership limitations of the Holdco LLC Agreement. 13
Footnotes:
10 ?The Exchange does not currently list or trade index options.
11 ? See Exchange Rule 21.5(d).
12 ?"Nonvoting Common Units" is defined in Section 3.2(g)(iii) of the Eighth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of MEMX Holdings LLC, as amended (the "Holdco LLC Agreement").
13 ? See , e.g ., Section 3.5(a)(ii) of the Holdco LLC Agreement, which states that "[n]o Exchange Member, either alone or together with its Related Persons, may own, directly or indirectly, of record or beneficially, Units constituting more than twenty percent (20%) of any class of Units."
Volume Requirements
The target performance ("Target Performance") for each Participant under the Supplemental Warrants Program is based on a Participant's step-up volume executed on MEMX Options expressed as a percentage of TCV? 14 above a specified baseline volume for such Participant. 15 More specifically, the Target Performance for a Participant with respect to any Measurement Period is 25 basis points of Step-Up Volume, where a Participant's "Step-Up Volume" is equal to the amount by which (i) the percentage of TCV executed on MEMX Options by such Participant with respect to such Measurement Period exceeds (ii) the average percentage of TCV executed on MEMX Options by such Participant with respect to the February 2025 and March 2025 Measurement Periods as calculated under the Original Warrants Program ("Baseline Performance"). 16 If a Participant achieves the Target Performance during any Measurement Period, the Participant's full allotment of unvested warrants for that Measurement Period will vest ( i.e., 11,650 warrants per calendar month, per ticket). During any Measurement Period, Participants that do not meet the Target Performance but meet a minimum performance level of 15 basis points of Step-Up Volume ("Minimum Performance") will have their warrants vest proportionally to their performance. 17
Footnotes:
14 ?"TCV" refers to Total Consolidated Volume, which is calculated as the volume reported by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a consolidated transaction reporting plan for the month for which the fees apply.
15 ?The Exchange notes that, as is the case under the Original Warrants Program, calculations for a Participant under the Supplemental Warrants Program also include a Participant's affiliates as communicated by the Participant to the Exchange.
16 ?The Baseline Performance for each Participant will be determined and communicated to the Participant in advance of the Effective Date.
17 ?The Exchange notes that warrants under the Original Warrants Program are eligible to vest proportionally based on three different minimum performance levels ( i.e., 10, 12.5, and 15 basis points of TCV), whereas warrants under the Supplemental Warrants Program are eligible to vest based on one minimum performance level ( i.e., 15 basis points of Step-Up Volume). This modification to proportional vesting is intended to simplify the administration of the program and incentivize Participants to strive for higher volume on MEMX Options ( i.e., at least 15 basis points of Step-Up Volume).
For example, if a Participant achieves 15 basis points of Step-Up Volume on MEMX Options in the month 1 Measurement Period, the Participant will vest 60% of their warrants for such month (6,990 vested warrants). As another example, if a Participant achieves 20 basis points of Step-Up Volume on MEMX Options during the month 1 Measurement Period, the Participant will vest 80% of their warrants for such month (9,320 vested warrants). However, if a Participant achieves 12 basis points of Step-Up Volume on MEMX Options in the month 1 Measurement Period, the Participant will vest no warrants for such month.
If a Participant fails to meet the Minimum Performance for any Measurement Period corresponding to month 1 through month 11, such Participant will have the opportunity to vest their unvested warrants if such Participant over-performs in a subsequent Measurement Period that corresponds to month 2 through month 12. For example, if a Participant achieves 25 basis points of Step-Up Volume on MEMX Options in month 1, 15 basis points of Step-Up Volume in month 2, 37.5 basis points of Step-Up Volume in month 3, and 25 basis points of Step-Up Volume in months 4 through 12, such Participant can recover their un-vested 4,660 warrants from month 2 based on such Participant's activity in month 3. Using the same example, if the Participant achieves the same number of basis points of Step-Up Volume noted in the above example in this paragraph for months 1, 2, and 4 through 12 but only achieves 31 basis points of Step-Up Volume in month 3, such Participant can recover 2,796 of the un-vested 4,660 warrants from month 2, and would forfeit the remaining 1,864 warrants. Partial basis points of Step-Up Volume and partial warrants achieved will be rounded according to standard rounding conventions ( i.e., rounded up if equal to or greater than 0.5, rounded down if below 0.5). To again use the same example, if the Participant achieves the same number of basis points of Step-Up Volume noted in the first example of this paragraph in months 1, 2, and 4 through 12 but only achieves 30.65 basis points in month 3, such Participant can recover 2,633 of the un-vested 4,660 warrants from month 2 (rounding up from 2,632.9 un-vested warrants), and would forfeit the remaining 2,027 warrants.
[top] The Exchange notes that whether a Participant achieves the step-up volume requirements does not in any way affect the pricing that such Participant would pay for trading on MEMX Options, which would be the same as for a non-Participant under the Exchange's Fee Schedule, but rather only relates to the vesting of such Participant's warrants under the Supplemental Warrants Program.
Restrictions on Vesting
Each vested warrant under the Supplemental Warrants Program shall be exercisable from the time of vesting until May 1, 2031. Vested warrants may be exercised when a Participant pays the exercise price of the warrant. Warrants have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933. Each Participant will have a standard piggyback registration right to include the Nonvoting Common Units issuable upon exercise of the warrants should Holdco at a later date file a Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933. The Nonvoting Common Units may not be transferred except pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 and such state securities laws, or an exemption from such registration thereunder, and are subject to transfer restrictions set forth in the Holdco LLC Agreement. 18 In the event of a Qualified Public Offering as defined in the Holdco LLC Agreement, the Nonvoting Common Units are subject to the transfer restrictions in Section 10.3 of the Holdco LLC Agreement, and Holdco shall have right of first offer on the transfer of such Nonvoting Common Units. In the event that Holdco sells Nonvoting Common Units to the public in an initial public offering pursuant to a registration statement declared effective by the SEC, then Holdco will give any Participant who holds warrants notice of the date when the initial public offering will take place. In such case, the fair market value of the Nonvoting Common Units will be as specified in the final prospectus regarding the initial public offering as filed with the SEC.
Footnotes:
18 ? See, e.g, Sections 10.3, 10.4, and 10.5 of the Holdco LLC Agreement. The Exchange notes that such Sections refer to Common Members throughout, rather than specifically referring to Nonvoting Common Units. Section 1.1 of the Holdco LLC Agreement defines a "Common Member" as a member in Holdco "holding Common Units in its capacity as such, together with its Affiliates that hold Common Units. . . ." Accordingly, the term Common Member includes any Holdco member, and does not distinguish between Holdco members holding Voting Common Units and members holding Nonvoting Common Units. As such, the transfer restrictions noted in the Holdco LLC Agreement, which refer to Common Members, are applicable to Nonvoting Common Units.
All participants in the Original Warrants Program were given the opportunity to participate in the Supplemental Warrants Program using the same eligibility criteria. All Participants that elect to participate in the Supplemental Warrants Program will participate on the same terms, conditions and restrictions. To be designated as a Participant, an applicant must: (i) be a registered broker-dealer pursuant to Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"); (ii) qualify as an "accredited investor" as such term is defined in Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933;? 19 (iii) be a participant in the Original Warrants Program; and (iv) have executed all required documentation for participation in the Supplemental Warrants Program. Participants must have executed the definitive documentation, satisfied the eligibility criteria required of Participants enumerated above, and tendered the Prepayment Fee by the Commitment Deadline.
Footnotes:
19 ?The purpose of this criterion relates to the ability of Holdco to sell shares of common stock pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. The definition of "accredited investor" under Rule 501(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 includes any broker or dealer registered pursuant to Section 15 of the Act. As noted above, a Participant will be required to be registered as a broker or dealer pursuant to Section 15 of the Act, therefore all Participants will satisfy this criterion.
As discussed above, the purpose of the Supplemental Warrants Program is the same as the Original Warrants Program-to encourage Participants to direct greater trade volume to MEMX Options to enhance trading volume on MEMX's options platform. Increased volume will provide for greater liquidity and enhanced price discovery, which benefits all market participants. Like the Exchange has under the Original Warrants Program, other exchanges have also previously engaged in the practice of incentivizing increased order flow in order to attract liquidity providers through equity sharing arrangements. 20 The Supplemental Warrants Program similarly intends to attract order flow, which will increase liquidity, thereby providing greater trading opportunities and tighter spreads for other market participants and causing a corresponding increase in order flow from these other market participants. The Supplemental Warrants Program will similarly reward the liquidity providers that provide this additional volume with a potential proprietary interest in MEMX.
Footnotes:
20 ? See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 62358 (June 22, 2010), 75 FR 37861 (June 30, 2010) (SR-NSX-2010-06); 64742 (June 24, 2011), 76 FR 38436 (June 30, 2011) (SR-NYSEAmex-2011-018); 69200 (March 21, 2013), 78 FR 18657 (March 27, 2013) (SR-CBOE-2013-31); 74095 (January 20, 2015). 80 FR 4011 (January 26, 2015) (SR-MIAX-2015-02); 74114 (January 22, 2015), 80 FR 4611 (January 28, 2015) (SR-BOX-2015-03); 74576 (March 25, 2015), 80 FR 17122 (March 31, 2015) (SR-BOX-2015-16); 80909 (June 12, 2017), 82 FR 27743 (June 16, 2017) (SR-MIAX-2017-28); 83012 (April 9, 2018), 83 FR 16163 (April 13, 2018) (SR-PEARL-2018-08); and 89730 (September 1, 2020), 85 FR 55530 (September 8, 2020) (SR-PEARL-2020-10).
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act? 21 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act? 22 in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) of the Act? 23 requirement that the rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act, 24 which requires that Exchange rules provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members and other persons using its facilities.
Footnotes:
21 ?15 U.S.C. 78f.
22 ?15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
23 ? See id.
24 ?15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
[top] The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the Supplemental Warrants Program is a supplement to the Exchange's Original Warrants Program, which is currently in effect and has substantially similar terms and conditions, and all participants in the Original Warrants Program may elect to participate (or elect not to participate) in the Supplemental Warrants Program and vest warrants on the same terms and conditions, assuming they satisfy the same eligibility criteria as described above. The eligibility criteria are objective and the same as those under the Original Warrants Program (except that Participants must also already be participants in the Original Warrants Program); thus, all Participants have the ability to satisfy the eligibility criteria to obtain a "ticket" for participation. Any Participant that becomes a ticket holder and pays the Prepayment Fee and otherwise satisfies the eligibility criteria has the same opportunity for their warrants to vest through volume contributions. The volume performance requirements are based on the same
The Exchange believes that the methodology used to calculate the volume thresholds is fair, reasonable and not unfairly discriminatory because it is based on objective criteria that is designed to increase trading volume on MEMX Options above levels achieved in recent months under the Original Warrants Program. The Supplemental Warrants Program is designed to reward Participants for executing additional volume on MEMX Options above a certain baseline level of volume that is calculated in the same manner for all Participants. As under the Original Warrants Program, the Exchange believes it is appropriate to exclude options on indices from the volume calculation because the Exchange wishes to support volume in equity options and ETFs on the MEMX Options platform and MEMX Options does not currently trade index options, and the Exchange also believes it is appropriate to provide double credit for activity in Non-Penny options for purposes of calculating the Participant's performance during the Measurement Period to encourage and reward such activity because the Exchange's fees for such products generate additional revenue for the Exchange as compared to options that are in the Penny Program.
The Exchange believes the Supplemental Warrants Program is equitable and reasonable because an increase in volume and liquidity resulting from the step-up volume requirements would benefit all market participants by providing more trading opportunities and tighter spreads, even to those market participants that do not participate in the Supplemental Warrants Program. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act because, as described above, the Supplemental Warrants Program is designed to bring greater volume and liquidity to the Exchange, which will benefit all market participants by providing tighter quoting and better prices, all of which perfects the mechanism for a free and open market and national market system.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will improve competition by providing market participants the opportunity to execute orders and post liquidity on the Exchange's options market.
The Exchange believes that the proposed change would increase both intermarket and intramarket competition by incentivizing Participants to direct their orders to the Exchange, which will enhance the quality of quoting and increase the volume of contracts traded on the Exchange. As noted above, the Supplemental Warrants Program is supplemental to the Exchange's Original Warrants Program, and all current participants in the Original Warrants Program were given the opportunity to participate in the Supplemental Warrants Program on the same terms and conditions, including the volume requirements and methodology for determining a Participant's Baseline Percentage. To the extent that there is an additional competitive burden on non-Participants, the Exchange believes that this is appropriate because the Supplemental Warrants Program should incent Participants to direct additional order flow to the Exchange and thus provide additional liquidity that enhances the quality of its market and increases the volume of contracts traded on the Exchange. To the extent that this purpose is achieved, the Exchange believes that all of the Exchange's market participants would benefit from the improved market liquidity. Enhanced market quality and increased transaction volume that results from the anticipated increase in order flow directed to the Exchange will benefit all market participants and improve competition on the Exchange.
Given the robust competition for volume among options markets, many of which offer the same products, implementing a program to attract order flow like the one proposed in this filing is consistent with the above-mentioned goals of the Act. This is especially true for the smaller options markets, such as MEMX, which is competing for volume with much larger exchanges that dominate the options trading industry. As a newer exchange, MEMX has a relatively low percentage of the average daily trading volume in options, so it is unlikely that the Supplemental Warrants Program could cause any competitive harm to the options market or to market participants. Rather, the Supplemental Warrants Program is a modest attempt to attract order volume away from larger competitors by adopting a pricing strategy designed to reward participants that execute additional volume on MEMX Options. The Exchange notes that if the Supplemental Warrants Program results in a modest percentage increase in the average daily trading volume on MEMX, while such percentage would represent a large volume increase for MEMX, it would represent a minimal reduction in volume of its larger competitors in the industry. The Exchange believes that the Supplemental Warrants Program will help further competition, because market participants will have yet another additional option in determining where to execute orders and post liquidity if they factor the benefits of MEMX equity participation into the determination.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act? 25 and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)? 26 thereunder.
Footnotes:
25 ?15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
26 ?17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
[top] Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission's internet comment form ( https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include file number SR-MEMX-2025-14 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-MEMX-2025-14. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website ( https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR-MEMX-2025-14 and should be submitted on or before July 7, 2025.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 27
Footnotes:
27 ?17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-10746 Filed 6-12-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P