88 FR 157 pgs. 55674-55685 - Notice of Availability of Tribal Allocation Formula for the Tribal Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates Programs
Type: NOTICEVolume: 88Number: 157Pages: 55674 - 55685
Pages: 55674, 55675, 55676, 55677, 55678FR document: [FR Doc. 2023-17571 Filed 8-15-23; 8:45 am]
Agency: Energy Department
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
[top]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Availability of Tribal Allocation Formula for the Tribal Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates Programs
AGENCY:
Office of State and Community Energy Programs, Department of Energy.
ACTION:
Notice of availability; request for comment.
SUMMARY:
The Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) is publishing its intended allocation formula that will be used to distribute funds to Indian Tribes through the $225 million Tribal Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates program. The purpose of the Tribal Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates program is to help Tribal households to reduce energy bills, increase home comfort, improve indoor air quality, and reduce emissions by providing direct funding for energy efficiency and electrification home upgrades. This notice provides the tentative allocation formula developed by the Department to distribute funds to Tribes, as well as the allocation amounts and data used to calculate allocations. This notice also describes how Tribes may partner with other Tribes through consortia to submit a single application to DOE, and how Tribes may authorize a third-party agent to handle the application and administration of a grant award.
DATES:
DOE is accepting public comment through September 15, 2023. Comments must be sent to irahomerebates@hq.doe.gov by midnight EST, September 15, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Interested parties are to submit comments electronically to irahomerebates@hq.doe.gov and include the subject line "Comment on FRN for Tribal Rebates."
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[top] Mr. Adam Hasz, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of State and Community Energy Programs, Home Energy Rebates
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
DOE is publishing its intended allocation formula for the Tribal Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates program. Through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), Public Law 117-169, section 50122, 1 Congress appropriated $225 million to DOE "to award grants to Indian Tribes to develop and implement a high-efficiency electric home rebate program . . . to remain available through September 30, 2031."? 2 Congress also authorized DOE to utilize 3% of the appropriated funds for program administration and technical assistance, which then provides $218.25 million to be awarded as grants directly to Indian Tribes to develop and implement Tribal rebates programs. 3 Through these grants, Indian Tribes may establish rebates programs to help reduce the upfront cost of efficient electric appliances and other accompanying home energy upgrades in single-family and multi-family homes. As all Federally Recognized Tribes and Tribal entities are Justice40 communities, whether or not they have land, this program also advances the President's historic Justice40 Initiative, established by Executive Order 14008, which set the goal that 40% of the overall benefits of certain Federal investments, such as in climate, clean energy and other areas, flow to disadvantaged or Justice40 communities. 4
Footnotes:
1 ?Codified at 42 U.S.C. 18795a. For more information about the high-efficiency electric home rebate program, commonly referred to as the "Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates Program", please visit www.energy.gov/scep/tribal-home-energy-rebates.
2 ?42 U.S.C. 18795a(a)(1)(B).
3 ?42 U.S.C. 18795a(a)(3).
4 ?E.O. 14008, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, 86 FR 7619 (Feb. 1, 2021).
While DOE is still developing the program requirements for the Tribal Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates program, DOE intends that this tentative formula and the accompanying information regarding the application process will help Indian Tribes to begin planning collaboratively with Tribally Designated Housing Entities (TDHEs), regional Tribal organizations, Tribal utilities, State Energy Offices, and other important Tribal partner organizations in advance of the release of the program requirements in late 2023.
This notice describes the intended allocation formula that DOE intends to use when issuing Tribal rebates program grant funds to Indian Tribes. 5 The allocation formula described in this notice take into consideration feedback provided by Indian Tribes during a Tribal Consultation DOE hosted in March 2023. DOE also consulted with Tribal housing organizations, other Tribal entities and partners, and other federal agencies with Tribal housing programs as it considered options for this formula.
Footnotes:
5 ?For this program, the term "Indian Tribe" has the meaning given the term in section 5304 of title 25. 42 U.S.C. 18795a(d)(3).
Appendix A provides the mathematical formula DOE plans to use to allocate funding amounts for each Tribe for the Tribal Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates program. Appendix B contains the data sources used by the formula to determine the allocations. Appendix C contains a table with the intended formula allocations for Indian Tribes.
DOE requests feedback on all topics discussed in this notice.
II. Tribal Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates Program Allocation Formula
Section 50122(a)(2)(B) of the IRA directs DOE to "reserve funds made available [for Indian Tribes] . . . in a manner determined appropriate by the Secretary."? 6 Through this direction, DOE set several goals for its planned Tribal Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates program allocation formulation based on feedback received during its Tribal Consultation and request for information submissions. 7 This notice describes these goals and the corresponding allocation formula components.
Footnotes:
6 ?42 U.S.C. 18795a(a)(2)(B). Grant awards are to be distributed to an Indian Tribe if the application is approved.
7 ?The DOE Home Energy Rebates Request for Information is available at https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/Default.aspx?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery#FoaId01172e95-5645-4356-8f3b-96fd144f9213.
First, DOE intends to provide an allocation to every Indian Tribe that wants to administer a home electrification and appliance rebates program. To achieve this goal, the formula must provide sufficient funding so that small and under-resourced Tribes can successfully administer rebate programs. While small Tribes often lack existing staff capacity, Tribes may utilize 20% of their grant to cover administrative expenses to help address this issue. DOE intends for the minimum award to each Tribe to provide a meaningful amount of funding for administrative costs, particularly if small Tribes choose to apply via a consortium as described in Section III of this Federal Register Notice. To meet this goal, DOE intends to set the minimum allocation per Tribe at $150,000; this amount will provide each Tribe with a minimum of $30,000 for administrative expenses. This minimum funding will also ensure that each Tribe can provide upgrades for at least eight households at the maximum rebate level of $14,000.
[top] Second, DOE intends to distribute Tribal rebates program grant funds based on Tribal housing and energy upgrade needs. DOE evaluated several potential datasets for housing and energy upgrade needs, but unfortunately most datasets lacked detailed information on housing conditions and energy burden or did not provide full data for all Tribal nations. The best available dataset to describe Tribal housing upgrade needs is the formula data used by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to allocate funding for its Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) program. 8 DOE intends to adopt the IHBG formula by using the proportion that each Tribe received out of the total allocations for IHBG grants in FY2023. Specifically, DOE will use the "Unadjusted FY 2023 Allocation" data from the FY 2023 IHBG Final Summary sheet. 9 The Unadjusted FY 2023 Allocation data sums two components from the IHBG formula, the "Need" component and the "Formula Current Assisted Stock" component, with small additional adjustments as required by IHBG regulations. 10 The IHBG formula's "Need" component uses datapoints on housing cost burden, households lacking kitchens or plumbing, low-income housing shortages, low-income Tribal households, and local American Indian and Alaska Native population within the Tribe's IHBG formula area. 11 The IHBG formula's "Formula Current Assisted Stock" component is a factor that incorporates the number of subsidized housing units that are
Footnotes:
8 ?The IHBG program website is available at www.hud.gov/program_offices/public_indian_housing/ih/grants/ihbg.
9 ?The "Unadjusted FY 2023 Allocation" is found in Column T of the IHBG FY 2023 Final Summary Sheets, available at https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hud.gov%2Fsites%2Fdfiles%2FPIH%2Fdocuments%2FFY_2023_Final_Summary_Sheets.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK.
10 ?The full regulations governing the IHBG formula are available at www.ecfr.gov/current/title-24/subtitle-B/chapter-IX/part-1000/subpart-D.
11 ?See 24 CFR 1000.324 for more information on this requirement.
12 ?See 24 CFR 1000.316 for more information on the "Formula Current Assisted Stock" component.
13 ?See 24 CFR 1000.336 for more information on the annual HUD challenge process data used in the IHBG formula.
Third, DOE intends to distribute Tribal rebates program grant funds in an equitable manner that avoids the double-counting of the need of Tribal households with overlapping membership at multiple Tribal levels. For example, in the case of Indian Tribes in Alaska, a Tribal citizen may simultaneously be a member of an Alaska Native Village, Alaska Native Village Corporation, and Alaska Native Regional Corporation. To avoid double-counting, DOE plans to provide funding through the method utilized by the IHBG formula, which credits data on local American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) population and housing needs for the "Need" formula to the Alaska Native Village. Because each Alaska Native Village Corporation has no "Need" data, it does not receive a formula allocation from the IHBG program. If "Need" data exists that is outside of the area of jurisdiction of the Alaska Native Village, HUD credits data on AIAN population and housing needs outside the Alaska Native Village area to the regional Indian Tribe, and if there is no regional Indian Tribe, to the Alaska Native Regional Corporation for the area. 14
Footnotes:
14 ?The HUD regulations for the "Need" component of the IHBG formula for Alaska Native Villages, Native Village Corporations, Regional Tribes, and Native Regional Corporations is available at www.ecfr.gov/current/title-24/subtitle-B/chapter-IX/part-1000/subpart-D/section-1000.327.
Formula Factors. The Tribal allocation formula DOE intends to implement for the Tribal Home Electrification and Appliance Rebate Program will use the following factors:
• Minimum Allocation of $150,000 per Indian Tribe.
• The relative share of the funding an Indian Tribe would receive from the IHBG formula, calculated by using the Tribe's "Unadjusted FY 2023 Allocation" divided the sum total of the "Unadjusted FY 2023 Allocation" components for all Tribes.
Funding Allocation Design: DOE's formula establishes a minimum level of funding of $150,000 per Indian Tribe. The formula then distributes the remaining funds via the relative share of the funding the Tribe would receive from the IHBG formula. For more detail on the Tribal rebates program grant funds allocation formula, see Appendix A of this notice.
DOE requests feedback on its intended allocation formula for the Tribal rebates program.
III. Designation of Tribal Consortium and Third-Party Agents That Can Submit on Behalf of a Tribe
To assist Tribes in accessing rebates program grant funds, DOE intends to offer two alternative ways for Tribes to apply. First, a group of Tribes may form a Tribal consortium and submit a single application package. This consortium will consist of two or more Indian Tribes, as defined within IRA section 50122(d)(3), that have designated a single Indian Tribe to act on their behalf as lead Indian Tribe of the Tribal consortium. The lead Indian Tribe would be the awardee and would be responsible for meeting all grant requirements on behalf of the Tribal consortium.
Second, DOE intends to allow for an individual Tribe or a Tribal consortium to authorize a third-party agent to prepare its grant application, submit the application, and manage grant funds for a Tribal Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates program. Tribes may choose any organization to serve as a third-party agent, including existing affiliates such as Tribally Designated Housing Entities (TDHEs), Tribal utilities, and regional Tribal organizations, so long as that organization is properly authorized to act on the Tribe's behalf via a "Tribal Council Resolution" or "Head of Government Letter."
If authorized by a Tribe or consortium, a third-party agent may draw funds from the Automated Standard Application for Payments (ASAP) system and deposit them into a designated bank account for a Tribe or a Tribal consortium as needed to pay for allowable costs. The third-party agent may also be allowed to submit the required reporting for the Indian Tribe or Tribal consortium pursuant to the award. However, only the Indian Tribe or the lead Indian Tribe of the Tribal consortium may be the awardee. The Indian Tribe and/or the lead Indian Tribe of the Tribal consortium, as applicable, will ultimately be responsible for satisfying all grant requirements. Additionally, the application must be submitted in the name of the Indian Tribe (or lead Indian Tribe if using a Tribal consortium) and use the Indian Tribe's (or lead Indian Tribe's) Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) in FedConnect.
A consortium application package or application package submitted by a third-party agent must include a "Tribal Council Resolution" or "Head of Government Letter" from each participating Indian Tribe designating the lead Indian Tribe of the Tribal consortium or third-party to act on its behalf and receive the funding allocated to that specific Tribe. The lead Indian Tribe in a Tribal consortium must also submit a "Tribal Council Resolution" or "Head of Government Letter" stating that it will apply for grant funding and administer the grant on behalf of all Tribes in the consortium; if the lead Tribe plans to work with a third-party agent, it must also identify the third-party agent's responsibilities within the "Tribal Council Resolution" or "Head of Government Letter".
DOE requests feedback on the Tribal consortium process and use of third-party agents working on behalf of a Tribe.
Appendix A. Tribal Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates Program Allocation Formula
[Federal Register graphic "EN16AU23.003" is not available. Please view the graphic in the PDF version of this document.]
A i = Total amount of funding allocated to Indian Tribe i
m = $150,000 (minimum funding each Indian Tribe must receive)
F = $218,250,000 (total amount of Tribal rebates program funding allocated to grants)
n = number of Indian Tribes receiving funding allocations? 15
Footnotes:
15 ?See Appendix B for details on small changes made to the list of Indian Tribes eligible for funding from this formula compared to the list of Tribes included in the HUD FY2023 IHBG Summary Allocations spreadsheet.
[top]
Footnotes:
16 ?See Appendix B for details on the slight adjustments made to the HUD FY2023 IHBG Summary Allocations spreadsheet, which is the source of this datapoint for each Tribe.
?E i = The sum of all tribes' "Unadjusted FY 2023 Allocation" numbers from the IHBG allocations
Appendix B. Data Used in the Tribal Rebates Program Allocation Formula
The formula included in Appendix A uses data from a slightly modified version of the "FY_2023_Final_Summary_Sheets" excel document made available by the HUD Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) program. 17 In consultation with HUD, DOE made the following changes to the original excel document:
Footnotes:
17 ?The summary spreadsheet of the HUD FY2023 IHBG allocations can be viewed at the following link: https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hud.gov%2Fsites%2Fdfiles%2FPIH%2Fdocuments%2FFY_2023_Final_Summary_Sheets.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK.
1. DOE removed state-recognized Tribes that receive IHBG allocation under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (NAHASDA)? 18 but that are not eligible to receive allocations under IRA section 50122. These five Tribes are the Coharie Tribe, the Haliwa-Saponi Indian Tribe, the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, the MOWA Band of Choctaw Indians, and the Waacamaw Siouan Tribe.
Footnotes:
18 ?The NAHASDA is available at https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ330/PLAW-104publ330.pdf.
2. DOE asked HUD to calculate the FY2023 allocation that the Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California would have received had they accepted IHBG funding. This allocation was then used as the basis of calculating the Tribal rebates program grant funds to be allocated to the Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Tribe.
3. HUD informed DOE that the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation received the Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope (ICAS) regional Tribe did not receive its FY2023 IHBG allocation but intends to be the recipient of its IHBG funding in FY2024. DOE asked HUD to switch the FY2023 allocation from the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation to ICAS. This follows the IHBG formula regulations for Tribes in Alaska, which assigns the data for the "Need" factor first to the Alaska Native Village, then the regional Tribe, and then to the Alaska Native Regional Corporation. 19
Footnotes:
19 ?The HUD regulations for the "Need" component of the IHBG formula for Alaska Native Villages, Native Village Corporations, Regional Tribes, and Native Regional Corporations is 24 CFR 1000.327, available at www.ecfr.gov/current/title-24/subtitle-B/chapter-IX/part-1000/subpart-D/section-1000.327.
After completing these changes to the "FY_2023_Final_Summary_Sheets" excel document with HUD assistance, DOE used the revised document as the basis for the data inputs for the formula included in Appendix A:
• n = 591, which is the number of Tribes included in the revised IHBG FY2023 allocations spreadsheet.
• E i = The Tribe's "Unadjusted FY 2023 Allocation" in Column T of the revised spreadsheet.
• ?E i = The sum of all Tribes' "Unadjusted FY 2023 Allocation" numbers in Column T of the revised spreadsheet.
The HUD Regulations that govern the collection of data and calculations using that data to create the "Unadjusted FY 2023 Allocation" numbers found within Column T of the revised spreadsheet under 24 CFR 1000.301, available at www.ecfr.gov/current/title-24/subtitle-B/chapter-IX/part-1000/subpart-D/.
Additional information and data related to the IHBG formula is available at www.hud.gov/program_offices/public_indian_housing/ih/codetalk/onap/ihbgformula.
Appendix C. List of Intended Formula Allocations for the Tribal Rebates Program
While the data components used to calculate the intended formula allocations for the Tribal Rebates Program are from IHBG FY 2023 data, DOE updated the Tribal names included in the following table to match the Tribal names that HUD updated and published on the FY 2024 estimates on June 1, 2023. 20 States are listed to assist with potential coordination of rebate programs between Tribes and State Energy Offices. However, all Tribal Rebates program allocations will be made directly to Tribes.
Footnotes:
20 ?The FY2024 estimated IHBG allocations that uses the updated list of Tribal names is available at https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hud.gov%2Fsites%2Fdfiles%2FPIH%2Fdocuments%2FFY_2024_Estimate_Allocation_Sheets.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK.
[top]
| State | Tribe | Allocation |
|---|---|---|
| OK | Absentee-Shawnee Tribe | $735,103 |
| NM | Acoma Pueblo | 343,645 |
| AK | Afognak | 156,621 |
| AK | Agdaagux Tribe of King Cove | 176,859 |
| CA | Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians | 176,929 |
| AK | AHTNA, Incorporated | 463,566 |
| AZ | Ak-Chin Indian Community | 248,214 |
| AK | Akhiok | 150,147 |
| AK | Akiachak | 229,218 |
| AK | Akiak | 193,948 |
| AK | Akutan | 151,449 |
| TX | Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas | 169,280 |
| OK | Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town | 173,013 |
| AK | Alakanuk | 240,628 |
| AK | Alatna | 150,147 |
| AK | Aleknagik | 158,737 |
| AK | Aleut Corporation | 440,822 |
| AK | Algaaciq (St. Mary's) | 218,930 |
| AK | Allakaket | 187,417 |
| CA | Alturas Indian Rancheria | 150,147 |
| AK | Alutiiq (Old Harbor) | 165,909 |
| AK | Ambler | 183,419 |
| AK | Anaktuvuk Pass | 173,409 |
| AK | Angoon | 162,139 |
| AK | Aniak | 194,462 |
| AK | Anvik | 159,273 |
| OK | Apache Tribe | 335,887 |
| AK | Arctic Village | 179,374 |
| AK | Asa'Carsarmiut Tribe (Mountain Village) | 252,076 |
| MT | Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes of Ft. Peck | 1,068,123 |
| AK | Atka | 150,147 |
| AK | Atmauthluak | 183,153 |
| AK | Atqasuk (Atkasook) | 155,937 |
| CA | Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians | 150,147 |
| WI | Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa | 452,016 |
| AK | Barrow Inupiat Traditional Government | 508,214 |
| MI | Bay Mills Indian Community | 290,230 |
| CA | Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria | 150,147 |
| AK | Beaver | 156,524 |
| AK | Belkofski | 150,147 |
| AK | Bering Straits Native Corporation | 370,925 |
| CA | Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians | 250,532 |
| CA | Big Lagoon Rancheria | 150,147 |
| CA | Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Owens Valley | 211,803 |
| CA | Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians | 198,943 |
| CA | Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians | 254,872 |
| AK | Bill Moore's Slough | 150,147 |
| AK | Birch Creek | 150,147 |
| CA | Bishop Paiute Tribe | 367,598 |
| MT | Blackfeet Tribe | 1,433,051 |
| CA | Blue Lake Rancheria | 150,147 |
| MN | Bois Forte Band, Minnesota Chippewa Tribe | 329,048 |
| AK | Brevig Mission | 197,069 |
| CA | Bridgeport Indian Colony | 176,839 |
| AK | Bristol Bay Native Corporation | 394,605 |
| AK | Buckland | 202,969 |
| CA | Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians | 150,147 |
| OR | Burns Paiute Tribe | 182,688 |
| CA | Cabazon Band of Mission Indians | 150,147 |
| CA | Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians, Colusa Rancheria | 150,147 |
| OK | Caddo Nation | 266,778 |
| CA | Cahto Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria | 219,302 |
| CA | Cahuilla Band of Indians | 150,147 |
| CA | California Valley Miwok Tribe | 150,147 |
| AK | Calista Corporation | 816,006 |
| CA | Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians | 253,980 |
| AK | Cantwell | 150,147 |
| CA | Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians | 169,870 |
| SC | Catawba Indian Nation | 493,421 |
| NY | Cayuga Nation | 205,532 |
| CA | Cedarville Rancheria | 150,147 |
| AK | Chalkyitsik | 168,759 |
| AK | Cheesh-Na | 150,147 |
| AK | Chefornak | 206,280 |
| CA | Chemehuevi Indian Tribe | 296,843 |
| AK | Chenega (Chanega) | 150,147 |
| CA | Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community (Trinidad Rancheria) | 150,155 |
| OK | Cherokee Nation | 6,489,212 |
| AK | Chevak | 275,983 |
| OK | Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes | 595,299 |
| SD | Cheyenne River Sioux | 1,201,976 |
| VA | Chickahominy Indian Tribe | 195,617 |
| VA | Chickahominy Indian Tribe-Eastern Division | 150,606 |
| AK | Chickaloon | 164,514 |
| OK | Chickasaw Nation | 2,520,908 |
| CA | Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians | 150,147 |
| AK | Chignik Bay Tribal Council | 150,147 |
| AK | Chignik Lagoon | 150,147 |
| AK | Chignik Lake | 150,147 |
| AK | Chilkat (Klukwan) | 150,147 |
| AK | Chilkoot (Haines) | 153,719 |
| AK | Chinik (Golovin) | 163,788 |
| MT | Chippewa Cree Indians of the Rocky Boy's Reservation | 642,286 |
| LA | Chitimacha Tribe | 167,176 |
| AK | Chitina | 150,147 |
| OK | Choctaw Nation | 2,451,562 |
| AK | Chuathbaluk (Russian Mission, Kuskokwim) | 153,606 |
| AK | Chugach Alaska Corporation | 611,511 |
| AK | Chuloonawick | 150,147 |
| AK | Circle | 155,282 |
| OK | Citizen Potawatomi Nation | 716,072 |
| AK | Clarks Point | 150,147 |
| CA | Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians | 198,261 |
| NM | Cochiti Pueblo | 192,865 |
| AZ | Cocopah Tribe | 320,614 |
| ID | Coeur D'Alene Tribe | 338,414 |
| CA | Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians | 219,621 |
| AZ | Colorado River Indian Tribes | 651,565 |
| OK | Comanche Nation | 644,586 |
| MT | Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes | 1,132,555 |
| WA | Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation | 1,359,390 |
| OR | Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians | 1,048,085 |
| WA | Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation | 357,665 |
| WA | Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation | 1,424,873 |
| OR | Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians | 358,967 |
| UT | Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation | 233,443 |
| OR | Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community | 853,041 |
| OR | Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation | 529,179 |
| OR | Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation | 458,722 |
| AK | Cook Inlet Region, Inc | 3,193,036 |
| OR | Coquille Indian Tribe | 396,269 |
| AK | Council | 150,147 |
| LA | Coushatta Tribe | 150,147 |
| OR | Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe | 381,416 |
| WA | Cowlitz Indian Tribe | 514,054 |
| CA | Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians | 252,840 |
| AK | Craig | 173,374 |
| AK | Crooked Creek | 158,734 |
| SD | Crow Creek Sioux Tribe | 462,133 |
| MT | Crow Tribe | 741,631 |
| AK | Curyung (Dillingham) | 278,419 |
| AK | Deering | 159,079 |
| OK | Delaware Nation (Western) | 157,890 |
| OK | Delaware Tribe of Indians (Eastern) | 238,265 |
| AK | Diomede (Inalik) | 167,022 |
| AK | Dot Lake | 150,147 |
| AK | Douglas | 216,213 |
| AK | Doyon, Ltd | 1,254,404 |
| CA | Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians | 314,934 |
| NV | Duck Valley Shoshone-Paiute Tribes | 606,641 |
| NV | Duckwater Shoshone Tribe | 238,553 |
| AK | Eagle | 150,147 |
| NC | Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians | 759,899 |
| MO | Eastern Shawnee Tribe | 153,406 |
| WY | Eastern Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River Reservation | 456,868 |
| AK | Eek | 228,954 |
| AK | Egegik | 150,147 |
| AK | Eklutna | 150,119 |
| AK | Ekuk | 150,147 |
| AK | Ekwok | 151,724 |
| CA | Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians (Sulphur Bank Rancheria) | 155,421 |
| AK | Elim | 197,456 |
| CA | Elk Valley Rancheria | 150,147 |
| NV | Ely Shoshone Tribe | 281,431 |
| AK | Emmonak | 230,911 |
| CA | Enterprise Rancheria of Maidu Indians | 269,631 |
| AK | Evansville (Bettles Field) | 150,147 |
| CA | Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians | 150,147 |
| AK | Eyak | 163,398 |
| NV | Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe | 454,550 |
| AK | False Pass | 150,147 |
| SD | Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe | 225,675 |
| MN | Fond Du Lac Band, Minnesota Chippewa Tribe | 971,518 |
| WI | Forest County Potawatomi Community | 210,225 |
| MT | Fort Belknap Indian Community | 552,541 |
| CA | Fort Bidwell Indian Community | 235,617 |
| CA | Fort Independence Indian Community of Paiute Indians | 156,591 |
| NV | Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Tribes | 274,535 |
| AZ | Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation | 180,413 |
| CA | Fort Mojave Indian Tribe | 441,202 |
| OK | Fort Sill Apache Tribe | 157,148 |
| AK | Fort Yukon | 219,957 |
| AK | Gakona | 150,147 |
| AK | Galena (Louden Village) | 179,973 |
| AK | Gambell | 252,459 |
| AK | Georgetown | 150,147 |
| AZ | Gila River Indian Community | 1,718,043 |
| AK | Goodnews Bay | 164,872 |
| MN | Grand Portage Band, Minnesota Chippewa Tribe | 210,246 |
| MI | Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians | 429,210 |
| CA | Graton Rancheria Federated Indians | 319,552 |
| AK | Grayling (Hokikachuk) | 180,893 |
| CA | Greenville Rancheria | 167,645 |
| CA | Grindstone Rancheria of Wintun-Wailaki Indians | 225,874 |
| CA | Guidiville Rancheria | 182,718 |
| AK | Gulkana | 150,118 |
| CA | Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake | 179,031 |
| AK | Hamilton | 150,147 |
| MI | Hannahville Indian Community | 185,496 |
| AZ | Havasupai Tribe | 158,998 |
| AK | Healy Lake | 150,147 |
| WI | Ho-Chunk Nation | 1,005,433 |
| WA | Hoh Indian Tribe | 168,840 |
| AK | Holy Cross | 173,698 |
| AK | Hoonah | 174,884 |
| CA | Hoopa Valley Tribe | 446,251 |
| AK | Hooper Bay | 299,004 |
| AZ | Hopi Tribe | 1,723,928 |
| CA | Hopland Band of Pomo Indians | 307,850 |
| ME | Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians | 258,504 |
| AZ | Hualapai Indian Tribe | 458,027 |
| AK | Hughes | 156,407 |
| AK | Huslia | 189,808 |
| AK | Hydaburg | 162,095 |
| AK | Igiugig | 150,147 |
| CA | Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel | 153,696 |
| AK | Iliamna | 150,147 |
| CA | Inaja Band of Diegueno Mission Indians | 150,147 |
| AK | Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope | 636,168 |
| CA | Ione Band of Miwok Indians | 213,808 |
| KS | Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska | 228,709 |
| OK | Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma | 159,704 |
| AK | Iqugmiut Traditional Council (Iqurmuit) | 164,445 |
| NM | Isleta Pueblo | 346,034 |
| AK | Ivanof Bay | 150,147 |
| CA | Jackson Band of Miwuk Indians | 150,147 |
| WA | Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe | 214,200 |
| CA | Jamul Indian Village | 150,147 |
| NM | Jemez Pueblo | 253,169 |
| LA | Jena Band of Choctaw Indians | 150,147 |
| NM | Jicarilla Apache Nation | 385,038 |
| AK | Kaguyak | 150,147 |
| AZ | Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians | 225,524 |
| AK | Kake | 170,327 |
| AK | Kaktovik | 161,665 |
| WA | Kalispel Indian Community | 204,963 |
| AK | Kalskag | 177,783 |
| AK | Kaltag | 160,253 |
| AK | Kanatak | 150,147 |
| AK | Karluk | 150,147 |
| CA | Karuk Tribe | 984,218 |
| AK | Kasaan | 150,147 |
| CA | Kashia Band of Pomo Indians, Stewarts Point Rancheria | 290,500 |
| AK | Kasigluk | 209,298 |
| OK | Kaw Nation | 292,410 |
| AK | Kenaitze | 403,026 |
| AK | Ketchikan | 350,849 |
| MI | Keweenaw Bay Indian Community | 522,062 |
| OK | Kialegee Tribal Town | 190,567 |
| AK | Kiana | 174,743 |
| TX | Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas | 178,142 |
| KS | Kickapoo Tribe of Kansas | 297,606 |
| OK | Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma | 242,090 |
| AK | King Island | 193,760 |
| AK | King Salmon | 151,059 |
| OK | Kiowa Indian Tribe | 400,643 |
| AK | Kipnuk | 265,729 |
| AK | Kivalina | 221,466 |
| OR | Klamath Tribes | 886,618 |
| AK | Klawock | 161,338 |
| CA | Kletsel Dehe Wintun Nation of the Cortina Rancheria | 159,288 |
| AK | Kluti Kaah (Copper Center) | 150,000 |
| AK | Knik | 430,655 |
| AK | Kobuk | 156,619 |
| CA | Koi Nation of Northern California (Lower Lake) | 150,147 |
| AK | Kokhanok | 165,042 |
| AK | Kongiganak | 207,079 |
| AK | Koniag, Incorporated | 866,019 |
| ID | Kootenai Tribe | 155,772 |
| AK | Kotlik | 241,676 |
| AK | Kotzebue | 378,657 |
| AK | Koyuk | 179,205 |
| AK | Koyukuk | 164,751 |
| AK | Kwethluk | 233,817 |
| AK | Kwigillingok | 185,873 |
| AK | Kwinhagak (Quinhagak) | 243,947 |
| CA | La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians | 188,293 |
| CA | La Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians | 150,147 |
| WI | Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa | 782,707 |
| WI | Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa | 503,265 |
| MI | Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians | 193,461 |
| NM | Laguna Pueblo | 409,157 |
| AK | Larsen Bay | 150,147 |
| NV | Las Vegas Tribe of Paiute Indians | 150,147 |
| MN | Leech Lake Band, Minnesota Chippewa Tribe | 1,013,163 |
| AK | Levelock | 156,582 |
| AK | Lime Village | 150,147 |
| MI | Little River Band of Ottawa Indians | 203,452 |
| MT | Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians | 703,094 |
| MI | Little Traverse Bay Band of Odawa Indians | 292,627 |
| CA | Lone Pine Paiute-Shoshone Tribe | 194,877 |
| CA | Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians | 150,147 |
| NV | Lovelock Paiute Tribe | 175,626 |
| SD | Lower Brule Sioux Tribe | 410,837 |
| WA | Lower Elwha Tribal Community | 269,914 |
| AK | Lower Kalskag | 192,677 |
| MN | Lower Sioux Indian Community | 187,778 |
| WA | Lummi Tribe | 891,738 |
| CA | Lytton Rancheria of California | 176,378 |
| WA | Makah Indian Tribe | 311,253 |
| CA | Manchester Band of Pomo Indians | 349,561 |
| AK | Manley Hot Springs | 150,147 |
| AK | Manokotak | 229,634 |
| CA | Manzanita Band of Diegueno Mission Indians | 150,147 |
| AK | Marshall (Fortuna Ledge) | 186,548 |
| AK | Mary's Igloo | 150,147 |
| CT | Mashantucket Pequot Indian Tribe | 150,147 |
| MA | Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe | 352,476 |
| MI | Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians | 178,601 |
| AK | McGrath | 159,061 |
| CA | Mechoopda Indian Tribe of Chico Rancheria | 225,101 |
| AK | Mekoryuk | 177,210 |
| WI | Menominee Indian Tribe | 687,663 |
| AK | Mentasta | 160,874 |
| CA | Mesa Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians | 193,801 |
| NM | Mescalero Apache Tribe | 573,991 |
| AK | Metlakatla (Annette Island) | 399,219 |
| OK | Miami Tribe | 152,756 |
| FL | Miccosukee Tribe | 150,147 |
| CA | Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians | 169,529 |
| ME | Mi'Kmaq Nation (Aroostook) | 308,077 |
| MN | Mille Lacs Band, Minnesota Chippewa Tribe | 438,763 |
| AK | Minto | 174,002 |
| MS | Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians | 868,318 |
| NV | Moapa Band of Paiute Indians | 221,921 |
| OK | Modoc Tribe | 166,583 |
| CT | Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut | 150,147 |
| VA | Monacan Indian Nation | 221,778 |
| CA | Mooretown Rancheria of Maidu Indians | 331,989 |
| CA | Morongo Band of Mission Indians | 201,017 |
| WA | Muckleshoot Indian Tribe | 430,708 |
| OK | Muscogee (Creek) Nation | 3,793,027 |
| AK | Naknek | 155,221 |
| NM | Nambe Pueblo | 196,173 |
| AK | NANA Corporation | 600,244 |
| VA | Nansemond Indian Tribe | 171,986 |
| AK | Nanwelek (English Bay) | 156,194 |
| AK | Napaimute | 150,147 |
| AK | Napakiak | 213,210 |
| AK | Napaskiak | 196,958 |
| RI | Narragansett Indian Tribe | 234,440 |
| AZ | Navajo Nation | 16,494,460 |
| AK | Nelson Lagoon | 150,147 |
| AK | Nenana | 161,731 |
| AK | New Koliganek | 162,260 |
| AK | New Stuyahok | 211,925 |
| AK | Newhalen | 151,375 |
| AK | Newtok | 197,733 |
| ID | Nez Perce Tribe | 407,903 |
| AK | Nightmute | 173,520 |
| AK | Nikolai | 155,326 |
| AK | Nikolski | 150,147 |
| AK | Ninilchik | 242,402 |
| WA | Nisqually Indian Tribe | 271,034 |
| AK | Noatak | 190,010 |
| AK | Nome Eskimo Community | 354,590 |
| AK | Nondalton | 150,147 |
| WA | Nooksack Indian Tribe | 323,427 |
| AK | Noorvik | 207,974 |
| WY | Northern Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation | 619,186 |
| MT | Northern Cheyenne Tribe | 699,715 |
| CA | Northfork Rancheria of Mono Indians | 397,522 |
| AK | Northway | 169,445 |
| UT | Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation | 186,149 |
| MI | Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi | 250,771 |
| AK | Nuiqsut (Nooiksut) | 181,025 |
| AK | Nulato | 173,660 |
| AK | Nunakauyarmiut (Toksook Bay) | 219,391 |
| AK | Nunam Iqua (Sheldon's Point) | 162,930 |
| AK | Nunapitchuk | 226,523 |
| SD | Oglala Sioux Tribe | 2,450,321 |
| NM | Ohkay Owingeh (San Juan Pueblo) | 274,032 |
| AK | Ohogamiut | 150,147 |
| NE | Omaha Tribe | 461,351 |
| NY | Oneida Indian Nation of New York | 295,488 |
| WI | Oneida Nation, Wisconsin | 1,104,088 |
| NY | Onondaga Nation | 150,147 |
| AK | Orutsararmuit (Bethel) | 585,262 |
| OK | Osage Nation | 448,649 |
| AK | Oscarville | 150,147 |
| OK | Otoe-Missouria Tribe | 204,799 |
| OK | Ottawa Tribe | 203,458 |
| AK | Ouzinkie | 151,651 |
| AK | Paimiut | 150,147 |
| UT | Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah | 484,458 |
| CA | Pala Band of Mission Indians | 234,191 |
| VA | Pamunkey Indian Tribe | 150,147 |
| AZ | Pascua Yaqui Tribe | 1,164,013 |
| CA | Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians | 200,364 |
| ME | Passamaquoddy Tribe | 310,985 |
| AK | Pauloff Harbor Village | 150,147 |
| CA | Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians | 150,569 |
| OK | Pawnee Nation | 261,466 |
| CA | Pechanga Band of Indians | 154,073 |
| AK | Pedro Bay | 150,147 |
| ME | Penobscot Nation | 416,658 |
| OK | Peoria Tribe | 408,645 |
| AK | Perryville | 152,571 |
| AK | Petersburg | 164,006 |
| CA | Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians | 364,650 |
| NM | Picuris Pueblo | 155,867 |
| AK | Pilot Point | 150,147 |
| AK | Pilot Station | 218,145 |
| CA | Pinoleville Pomo Nation | 188,740 |
| CA | Pit River Tribe | 423,574 |
| AK | Pitka's Point | 159,624 |
| AK | Platinum | 150,114 |
| ME | Pleasant Point | 287,593 |
| AL | Poarch Band of Creeks | 416,301 |
| AK | Point Hope | 204,412 |
| AK | Point Lay | 172,190 |
| NM | Pojoaque Pueblo | 161,798 |
| MI | Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians | 762,067 |
| OK | Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma | 310,988 |
| NE | Ponca Tribe of Nebraska | 642,855 |
| WA | Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe | 359,207 |
| AK | Port Graham | 155,150 |
| AK | Port Heiden | 150,147 |
| AK | Port Lions | 150,147 |
| AK | Portage Creek | 150,147 |
| CA | Potter Valley Tribe | 150,147 |
| KS | Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation | 198,302 |
| MN | Prairie Island Indian Community | 150,147 |
| WA | Puyallup Tribe | 911,893 |
| NV | Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe | 503,408 |
| AK | Qagan Tayagungin (Sand Point) | 185,543 |
| AK | Qawalangin (Unalaska) | 157,765 |
| OK | Quapaw Tribe | 180,793 |
| CA | Quartz Valley Indian Community | 240,027 |
| AZ | Quechan Tribe | 440,597 |
| WA | Quileute Tribe | 250,740 |
| WA | Quinault Indian Nation | 586,321 |
| CA | Ramona Band of Cahuilla | 150,147 |
| AK | Rampart | 151,067 |
| VA | Rappahannock Tribe, Inc | 153,217 |
| WI | Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa | 375,294 |
| AK | Red Devil | 150,147 |
| MN | Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians | 945,181 |
| CA | Redding Rancheria | 178,860 |
| CA | Redwood Valley Rancheria | 190,780 |
| NV | Reno-Sparks Indian Colony | 429,378 |
| CA | Resighini Rancheria | 150,147 |
| CA | Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians | 199,419 |
| CA | Robinson Rancheria | 217,750 |
| SD | Rosebud Sioux Tribe | 1,658,047 |
| CA | Round Valley Indian Tribes | 897,335 |
| AK | Ruby | 179,514 |
| IA | Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi, IA | 197,241 |
| KS | Sac and Fox Nation of Missouri | 180,929 |
| OK | Sac and Fox Nation, Oklahoma | 455,270 |
| MI | Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe | 437,586 |
| AK | Saint George Island | 150,147 |
| AK | Saint Michael | 216,459 |
| AK | Saint Paul Island | 166,895 |
| NY | Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe | 441,321 |
| AK | Salamatof | 151,650 |
| AZ | Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community | 669,857 |
| WA | Samish Indian Nation | 400,258 |
| AZ | San Carlos Apache Tribe | 1,417,171 |
| NM | San Felipe Pueblo | 247,121 |
| NM | San Ildefonso Pueblo | 197,744 |
| AZ | San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe | 163,770 |
| CA | San Pasqual Band of Diegueno Mission Indians | 196,514 |
| NM | Sandia Pueblo | 176,721 |
| NM | Santa Ana Pueblo | 184,365 |
| NM | Santa Clara Pueblo | 279,204 |
| CA | Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians | 150,147 |
| CA | Santa Rosa Indian Community | 243,462 |
| CA | Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians | 184,019 |
| NE | Santee Sioux Nation | 312,801 |
| NM | Santo Domingo Pueblo | 311,742 |
| WA | Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe | 240,655 |
| MI | Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians | 1,199,867 |
| AK | Savoonga | 292,683 |
| AK | Saxman | 161,123 |
| AK | Scammon Bay | 226,581 |
| CA | Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians | 174,414 |
| AK | Selawik | 256,701 |
| AK | Seldovia | 150,147 |
| OK | Seminole Nation | 499,035 |
| FL | Seminole Tribe of Florida | 310,795 |
| NY | Seneca Nation of New York | 643,131 |
| OK | Seneca-Cayuga Nation | 174,702 |
| AK | Shageluk | 161,249 |
| MN | Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community | 171,967 |
| AK | Shaktoolik | 172,073 |
| OK | Shawnee Tribe | 150,147 |
| CA | Sherwood Valley Rancheria of Pomo Indians | 252,257 |
| CA | Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians | 188,922 |
| NY | Shinnecock Indian Nation | 153,757 |
| AK | Shishmaref | 238,944 |
| WA | Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe | 187,901 |
| ID | Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Ft. Hall Reservation | 446,127 |
| AK | Shungnak | 172,318 |
| SD | Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate | 881,398 |
| AK | Sitka Tribe (Baranof Island) | 408,917 |
| AK | Skagway | 151,020 |
| WA | Skokomish Indian Tribe | 266,877 |
| UT | Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians | 150,147 |
| AK | Sleetmute | 155,353 |
| WA | Snoqualmie Indian Tribe | 202,607 |
| CA | Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians | 194,268 |
| WI | Sokaogon Chippewa Community | 317,192 |
| AK | Solomon | 150,147 |
| AK | South Naknek | 150,147 |
| CO | Southern Ute Indian Tribe | 408,002 |
| ND | Spirit Lake Tribe | 715,203 |
| WA | Spokane Tribe | 663,069 |
| WA | Squaxin Island Tribe | 327,613 |
| WI | St. Croix Chippewa Indians | 428,383 |
| ND | Standing Rock Sioux Tribe | 1,257,983 |
| AK | Stebbins Community Association | 237,840 |
| AK | Stevens Village | 150,147 |
| WA | Stillaguamish Tribe | 187,334 |
| WI | Stockbridge-Munsee Community | 233,473 |
| AK | Stony River | 150,147 |
| NV | Summit Lake Paiute Tribe | 150,147 |
| AK | Sun'aq Tribe of Kodiak (Shoonaq') | 221,514 |
| WA | Suquamish Indian Tribe | 334,754 |
| CA | Susanville Indian Rancheria | 299,971 |
| WA | Swinomish Indian Tribal Community | 383,295 |
| CA | Sycuan Band of Kumeyaay Nation | 150,147 |
| CA | Table Mountain Rancheria | 150,147 |
| AK | Takotna | 150,147 |
| AK | Tanacross | 157,472 |
| AK | Tanana | 177,226 |
| AK | Tangirnaq (Lesnoi) | 150,147 |
| NM | Taos Pueblo | 223,153 |
| AK | Tatitlek | 150,147 |
| AK | Tazlina | 150,147 |
| CA | Tejon Indian Tribe | 150,147 |
| AK | Telida | 150,147 |
| AK | Teller | 178,153 |
| NV | Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians | 382,149 |
| NM | Tesuque Pueblo | 160,492 |
| AK | Tetlin | 165,753 |
| OK | Thlopthlocco Tribal Town | 197,627 |
| ND | Three Affiliated Tribes of Fort Berthold | 840,237 |
| CA | Timbisha Shoshone Tribe (Death Valley) | 165,495 |
| AK | Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes Central Council | 1,122,121 |
| AK | Togiak | 231,335 |
| AZ | Tohono O'odham Nation | 3,029,950 |
| CA | Tolowa Dee-ni' Nation (Smith River Rancheria) | 359,727 |
| NY | Tonawanda Band of Seneca | 150,147 |
| OK | Tonkawa Tribe | 239,692 |
| AZ | Tonto Apache Tribe of Arizona | 150,147 |
| CA | Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians | 177,629 |
| WA | Tulalip Tribes | 824,467 |
| CA | Tule River Indian Tribe | 471,504 |
| AK | Tuluksak | 206,706 |
| LA | Tunica-Biloxi Tribe | 231,339 |
| AK | Tuntutuliak | 251,666 |
| AK | Tununak | 190,668 |
| CA | Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians | 214,943 |
| ND | Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians | 1,590,715 |
| NY | Tuscarora Nation | 150,147 |
| CA | Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians | 150,147 |
| AK | Twin Hills | 157,700 |
| AK | Tyonek | 181,678 |
| AK | Ugashik | 150,147 |
| AK | Umkumiut | 150,147 |
| AK | Unalakleet | 191,280 |
| AK | Unga | 150,147 |
| CA | United Auburn Indian Community | 179,384 |
| OK | United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians | 421,409 |
| VA | Upper Mattaponi Tribe | 177,339 |
| MN | Upper Sioux Community | 193,837 |
| WA | Upper Skagit Tribe | 418,390 |
| UT | Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation | 460,479 |
| CO | Ute Mountain Ute Tribe | 437,798 |
| CA | Utu Utu Gwaiti Paiute Tribe | 150,147 |
| AK | Venetie | 174,797 |
| CA | Viejas Group of Capitan Grande Band | 171,756 |
| AK | Wainwright | 202,468 |
| AK | Wales | 184,835 |
| NV | Walker River Paiute Tribe | 637,169 |
| MA | Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) | 218,538 |
| NV | Washoe Tribe | 464,204 |
| MN | White Earth Band, Minnesota Chippewa Tribe | 796,991 |
| AK | White Mountain | 170,835 |
| AZ | White Mountain Apache (Fort Apache) | 1,845,814 |
| OK | Wichita and Affiliated Tribes | 226,465 |
| CA | Wilton Rancheria | 255,758 |
| NE | Winnebago Tribe | 433,218 |
| NV | Winnemucca Indian Colony | 150,147 |
| CA | Wiyot Tribe (Table Bluff) | 150,147 |
| AK | Wrangell | 174,561 |
| OK | Wyandotte Nation | 257,115 |
| AK | Yakutat Tlingit Tribe | 158,159 |
| SD | Yankton Sioux Tribe | 551,918 |
| AZ | Yavapai-Apache Nation (Camp Verde) | 327,173 |
| AZ | Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe | 150,147 |
| NV | Yerington Paiute Tribe | 316,605 |
| CA | Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation (Rumsey Rancheria) | 150,147 |
| NV | Yomba Shoshone Tribe | 204,468 |
| TX | Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo | 601,545 |
| CA | Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation (San Manuel) | 150,147 |
| AK | Yupiit of Andreafski | 158,077 |
| CA | Yurok Tribe | 1,152,502 |
| NM | Zia Pueblo | 195,243 |
| NM | Zuni Tribe | 701,430 |
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on August 10, 2023, by Dr. Henry McKoy, Director of the Office of State and Community Energy Programs, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as an official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the Federal Register .
Signed in Washington, DC, on August 11, 2023.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2023-17571 Filed 8-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P