88 FR 5 pgs. 1133-1134 - Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of San Mateo County, California, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area
Type: RULEVolume: 88Number: 5Pages: 1133 - 1134
Pages: 1133, 1134FR document: [FR Doc. 2023-00108 Filed 1-6-23; 8:45 am]
Agency: Personnel Management Office
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
[top]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206-AO46
Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of San Mateo County, California, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area
AGENCY:
Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a final rule to define San Mateo County, California, as an area of application county to the Monterey, CA, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area. This change is necessary because there are three NAF FWS employees working in San Mateo County, and the county is not currently defined to a NAF wage area.
DATES:
Effective date: This regulation is effective February 8, 2023. Applicability date: This change applies on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after February 8, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ana Paunoiu, by telephone at (202) 606-2858 or by email at pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On September 21, 2022, OPM issued a proposed rule (87 FR 57651) to define San Mateo County, California, as an area of application county to the Monterey, CA, NAF FWS wage area.
The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC), the national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees, reviewed and recommended these changes by consensus.
The 30-day comment period ended on October 21, 2022. OPM received one comment in support of the proposal to define San Mateo County, CA, to the Monterey, CA wage area.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
This action is not a "significant regulatory action" under the terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore not subject to review under E.O. 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
OPM certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they will affect only Federal agencies and employees.
Federalism
We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State, local, or tribal governments.
Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in Executive Order 12988.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency management, personnel, and organization and does not substantially affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties and, accordingly, is not a "rule" as that term is used by the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA)). Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Stephen Hickman,
Federal Register Liaison.
Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532-PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; §?532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
2. In Appendix D to subpart B, amend the table by revising the wage area listing for the State of California to read as follows:
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532-Nonappropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas
Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage Area Survey Areas
[top]
| * * * * * |
| CALIFORNIA |
| Kern |
| Survey Area |
| California: |
| Kern |
| Area of Application. Survey area plus: |
| California: |
| Fresno |
| Kings |
| Los Angeles |
| Survey Area |
| California: |
| Los Angeles |
| Area of Application. Survey area. |
| Monterey |
| Survey Area |
| California: |
| Monterey |
| Area of Application. Survey area plus: |
| California: |
| San Mateo |
| Santa Clara |
| Orange |
| Survey Area |
| California: |
| Orange |
| Area of Application. Survey area. |
| Riverside |
| Survey Area |
| California: |
| Riverside |
| Area of Application. Survey area. |
| Sacramento |
| Survey Area |
| California: |
| Sacramento |
| Area of Application. Survey area plus: |
| California: |
| Yuba |
| Oregon: |
| Jackson |
| Klamath |
| San Bernadino |
| Survey Area |
| California: |
| San Bernadino |
| Area of Application. Survey area. |
| San Diego |
| Survey Area |
| California: |
| San Diego |
| Area of Application. Survey area. |
| San Joaquin |
| Survey Area |
| California: |
| San Joaquin |
| Area of Application. Survey area. |
| Santa Barbara |
| Survey Area |
| California: |
| Santa Barbara |
| Area of Application. Survey area plus: |
| California: |
| San Luis Obispo |
| Solano |
| Survey Area |
| California: |
| Solano |
| Area of Application. Survey area plus: |
| California: |
| Alameda |
| Contra Costa |
| Marin |
| Napa |
| San Francisco |
| Sonoma |
| Ventura |
| Survey Area |
| California: |
| Ventura |
| Area of Application. Survey area. |
[FR Doc. 2023-00108 Filed 1-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P