86 FR 165 pgs. 48295-48296 - Government in the Sunshine Act
Type: RULEVolume: 86Number: 165Pages: 48295 - 48296
Pages: 48295, 48296Docket number: [Docket No. DNFSB-2021-0001]
FR document: [FR Doc. 2021-18549 Filed 8-27-21; 8:45 am]
Agency: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
[top]
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD
10 CFR Part 1704
[Docket No. DNFSB-2021-0001]
Government in the Sunshine Act
AGENCY:
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
ACTION:
Direct final rule.
SUMMARY:
The William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (NDAA) amended the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (AEA) to grant the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board or DNFSB) relief from certain limitations under the Government in the Sunshine Act (Sunshine Act). The Sunshine Act generally requires all Board meetings to be open to public observation unless certain exemptions apply. The NDAA added a provision to the AEA that permits the Board to hold nonpublic collaborative discussions without following the requirements of the Sunshine Act, so long as certain requirements are met. The Board is publishing this direct final rule to revise the Board's Sunshine Act regulations consistent with the new AEA provisions for nonpublic collaborative discussions.
DATES:
This final rule is effective November 29, 2021 unless significant adverse comments are received by September 29, 2021. If the direct final rule is withdrawn as a result of such comments, timely notice of the withdrawal will be published in the Federal Register .
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments at any time prior to the comment deadline by the following methods:
• Email: Send an email to comment@dnfsb.gov. Please include "Sunshine Act Comments" in the subject line of your email.
• Mail: Send hard copy comments to The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Attn: Office of the General Counsel, 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eric Fox, Associate General Counsel, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901, (202) 694-7000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The NDAA became law on January 1, 2021. The NDAA contained an amendment to the AEA that granted the Board relief from certain requirements of the Sunshine Act. Under the revised section 313 of the AEA (42 U.S.C. 2286b(k)), a quorum of the Board may hold meetings to deliberate on official agency business without public observation so long as it conducts the meeting in compliance with the following requirements: (1) No formal or informal vote may be taken at the meeting; (2) each individual present at the meeting must be a member or an employee of the Board; (3) at least one member from each political party represented on the Board must be present; and (4) the Board's General Counsel or his or her designee must be present.
In addition to the requirements governing the conduct of the meeting, the AEA requires the Board to publish a summary of the matters discussed, including key issues, no later than two business days following the meeting. In circumstances where the matters discussed are covered by the exemptions to the open meetings requirements of the Sunshine Act, the Board must publish as much general information as possible without disclosing the exempt material. Unlike closed meetings held under the Sunshine Act, no transcript or advanced public notice is required.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 1704.11 Nonpublic Collaborative Discussions
This new section contains the requirements for the conduct of nonpublic collaborative discussions as well as disclosure after they are held. These requirements are simply restating the language of the AEA, and do not expand or diminish the Board's obligations when holding a nonpublic collaborative discussion.
III. Regulatory Analysis
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, agencies must consider the impact of their rulemakings on "small entities" (small businesses, small organizations, and local governments) when publishing regulations subject to the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. As noted in section IV Rulemaking Procedure below, the Board has determined that notice and the opportunity to comment are unnecessary because this rulemaking constitutes a limited, routine change to implement the recent amendment to the AEA. Therefore, no analysis is required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions are deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act
[top] The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) establishes certain requirements when an agency conducts or sponsors a "collection of information." 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. This update to the Board's Sunshine Act regulations does not require or request information from members of the public. Therefore, this rulemaking is not covered by the restrictions of the PRA.
Executive Order 12988 and Executive Order 13132-Federalism
According to Executive Orders 12988 and 13132, agencies must state in clear language the preemptive effect, if any, of new regulations. The amendments to the agency's Sunshine Act implementing regulations affect only how the Board conducts nonpublic meetings, and therefore, have no effect on preemption of State, tribal, or local government laws or otherwise have federalism implications.
Congressional Review Act
This rule will not result in and is not likely to result in (A) an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; (B) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or (C) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets. As such, the Office of Management and Budget has not found it to be a major rule as defined in the Congressional Review Act. To comply with the Congressional Review Act, the Board will submit the required information each House of the Congress and the Comptroller General.
Finding of No Significant Environmental Impact
The proposed regulations amend the Board procedures for holding meetings pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act. The procedural changes to the Sunshine Act implementing regulations will not result in significant impacts affecting the quality of the human environment, unavoidable adverse environmental effects, rejection of reasonable alternatives to the proposed action, or irreversible or irretrievable commitments of environmental resources. The agency has not consulted with any other agencies in making this determination.
IV. Rulemaking Procedure
In light of the amendments made to the AEA at 42 U.S.C. 2286b(k), this rulemaking makes limited conforming changes to the Board's rules implementing the Sunshine Act (10 CFR part 1704). The Board is using the "direct final rule" procedure because this rulemaking represents a limited, routine change to implement the new provisions of the AEA. This amendment will become effective on November 29, 2021. However, if the Board receives a significant adverse comment by September 29, 2021, then the Board will publish a notice in the Federal Register withdrawing this rule and publishing the changes as a notice of proposed rulemaking. The Board will respond to the significant adverse comment(s) in that notice of proposed rulemaking and take an additional 30 days of comments before publishing any final rule. If no significant adverse comment is received, the Board will publish a notice that confirms the effective date of this direct final rule.
A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and provides a reason sufficient to require a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process. For example, a substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the Board staff to reevaluate (or reconsider) its position or conduct additional analysis;
(b) The comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a substantive response to clarify or complete the record; or
(c) The comment raises a relevant issue that was not previously addressed or considered by the Board.
(2) The comment proposes a change or an addition to the rule, and it is apparent that the rule would be ineffective or unacceptable without incorporation of the change or addition; or
(3) The comment causes the Board to make a change (other than editorial) to the rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 1704
Sunshine Act.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board amends 10 CFR part 1704 as follows:
PART 1704-RULES IMPLEMENTING THE GOVERNMENT IN THE SUNSHINE ACT
1. The authority citation for part 1704 is revised to read as follows:
Authority:
5 U.S.C. 552b; 42 U.S.C. 2286, 2286b(c), (k).
2. Add §?1704.11 to read as follows:
§?1704.11 Nonpublic collaborative discussions.
(a) In general. Notwithstanding the other requirements of this part, a quorum of Members may hold a meeting that is not open to public observation to discuss official business of the Board if-
(1) No formal or informal vote or other official action is taken at the meeting;
(2) Each individual present at the meeting is a Member or an employee of the Board;
(3) At least one Member from each political party is present at the meeting, unless all Members are of the same political party at the time of the meeting; and
(4) The general counsel of the Board, or a designee of the general counsel, is present at the meeting.
(b) Disclosure of nonpublic collaborative discussions. (1) Except as provided by paragraph (b)(2) of this section, not later than two business days after the conclusion of a meeting described in subsection (a), the Board shall make available to the public, in a place easily accessible to the public-
(i) A list of the individuals present at the meeting; and
(ii) A summary of the matters, including key issues, discussed at the meeting, except for any matter the Board properly determines may be withheld from the public under §?1704.4.
(2) Information about matters withheld from the public. If the Board properly determines under paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section that a matter may be withheld from the public under §?1704.4, the Board shall include in the summary required by paragraph (b)(1)(ii) as much general information as possible with respect to the matter.
Dated: August 24, 2021.
Joyce Connery,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2021-18549 Filed 8-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P