85 FR 227 pgs. 74884-74888 - Air Plan Approval; NC; Blue Ridge Paper SO
2
Emission Limits
Type: RULEVolume: 85Number: 227Pages: 74884 - 74888
Pages: 74884, 74885, 74886, 74887, 74888Docket number: [EPA–R04–OAR–2020–0001; FRL–10016–41 Region 4]
FR document: [FR Doc. 2020–25464 Filed 11–23–20; 8:45 am]
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
[top]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0001; FRL-10016-41 Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; NC; Blue Ridge Paper SO 2 Emission Limits
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
[top] The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a source-specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of North Carolina Department of Environmental
DATES:
This rule is effective November 24, 2020.
ADDRESSES:
EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0001. All documents in the docket are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials can either be retrieved electronically via www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Evan Adams, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404) 562-9009. Mr. Adams can also be reached via electronic mail at adams.evan@epa.gov.
I. Background
On June 24, 2020, North Carolina submitted a draft source-specific SIP revision through parallel processing to EPA for approval. Specifically, North Carolina's June 24, 2020, draft SIP revision requested EPA incorporate specific SO 2 permit limits and associated operating restrictions, MRR, and testing compliance parameters contained in title V operating permit number 08961T29 (T29) issued to BRPP? 1 by DAQ, on June 2, 2020, into the North Carolina SIP to establish these emission limits and parameters as permanent federally enforceable control measures and strengthen the North Carolina SIP. BRPP is a subsidiary of Evergreen Packaging and is located in the City of Canton in Beaverdam Township, Haywood County, North Carolina, 25 kilometers west of Asheville, North Carolina.
Footnotes:
1 ?BRPP is a vertically integrated pulp and paper mill that produces specialty paperboard packaging products. BRPP's primary operations are classified under North American Industry Classification System 322121 (Paper Except Newsprint Mills). The facility utilizes multiple boilers to produce steam for energy generation and provide heat for the pulping and paper making processes.
In a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on August 31, 2020 (85 FR 53715), EPA proposed to approve North Carolina's June 24, 2020, draft source-specific SIP revision. In this action, EPA is now finalizing approval of North Carolina's source-specific SIP revision for BRPP which was submitted in final form on September 3, 2020. EPA reviewed the final submission, and it contains no substantive changes to North Carolina's June 24, 2020, draft source-specific SIP revision that EPA proposed to approve in the August 31, 2020, NPRM. Table 1 below lists the emissions limits to be incorporated in the North Carolina SIP for BRPP. 2
Footnotes:
2 ?More detail on the emission units, emission limits, and operating, MRR, and testing requirements are provided in the August 31, 2020, NPRM. See 85 FR 53715.
| Emission unit ID | Emission unit description | SO 2 Permitted emission limit Title V permit No. 08961T29 (lb/hr)* |
|---|---|---|
| G08020 | No. 10 Recovery Furnace-BLS-normal Operation | 28.0 |
| No. 10 Recovery Furnace-ULSD-startup and shutdown | 0.54 | |
| G08021 | No. 11 Recovery Furnace-BLS-normal operation | 28.0 |
| No. 11 Recovery Furnace-ULSD-startup and shutdown | 0.54 | |
| G09028 | No. 4 Lime Kiln | 6.28 |
| G09029 | No. 5 Lime Kiln | 10.47 |
| G11039 | Riley Coal Boiler | 61.32 |
| G11040 | No. 4 Power Boiler | 82.22 |
| G11042 | Riley Bark Boiler | 68.00 |
| *lb/hr = pounds per hour; BLS = black liquor solids; and ULSD = ultra low sulfur diesel. | ||
[top]
The August 31, 2020, NPRM provides additional detail regarding the background and rationale for EPA's action. Comments on the August 31, 2020, NPRM were due on or before September 30, 2020.
II. Response to Comments
EPA received five comments on the August 31, 2020, NPRM, all of which are included in the EPA docket under Docket Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0001. All five comments are generally supportive of the stricter SO 2 emission limits and EPA's action to approve SO 2 emission limits and compliance parameters into the North Carolina SIP. One commenter also expressed their satisfaction with air permits and how they believe they prove to be an efficient way to limit SO 2 emissions. Furthermore, the BRPP facility provided comments in support of EPA's proposed action. EPA summarizes and responds to one specific comment below to provide clarification.
Comment: One commenter stated that the stricter SO 2 limits at the BRPP facility are a "welcomed sight," and that they support the stricter limitations but also notes, "The implementation of continuous monitoring devices is paramount for such standards to be met." The commenter also states that the limits "although relatively strict, should strive to become more strict as there were no restrictions for SO 2 prior" and that the limits should be monitored periodically to reduce emissions rather than wait until new equipment is added.
Response: EPA appreciates the commenter's support of the new SO 2 emission limits to strengthen the North Carolina SIP. Regarding the commenter's statements concerning monitoring, EPA notes that the permit conditions for five of the seven emission units at BRPP that EPA is incorporating into the North Carolina SIP require continuous monitoring to ensure proper operation of associated emissions control equipment and continuous compliance with the SO 2 emission limits. 3 As EPA explained in the August 31, 2020, NPRM, the type of monitoring required for these units is known as parametric monitoring, and it is a common method to ensure continuous compliance with an emissions limit in lieu of continuous direct sampling and monitoring of the subject pollutant. This is a common regulatory approach used in various Federal regulations such as the Maximum Achievable Control Technology standards and New Source Performance Standards.
Footnotes:
3 ?The permit conditions for other two emissions units EPA is incorporating into the North Carolina SIP require fuel usage restrictions and associated recordkeeping to ensure compliance with the SO 2 emissions limits.
In BRPP's permit T29, parametric monitoring is required for the five emissions units that use a scrubber to control SO 2 emissions. The parameters that are critical to proper operations of these scrubbers include scrubber liquid flow, pH, and pressure drop as provided in T29 and explained in more detail in the NPRM. T29 includes conditions restricting operating levels for each of the relevant parameters to minimum levels that demonstrate compliance with the underlying SO 2 emission limit as established during performance testing and requires continuous monitoring devices for these parameters. In addition, permit T29 requires periodic testing to confirm that the established operating levels for the relevant parameters continue to demonstrate compliance with the SO 2 emission limits and requires BRPP to comply with any revised operating parameters as needed to demonstrate continuous compliance with the SO 2 emission limits based on such future tests. EPA's final action approves these operating and continuous monitoring requirements and parameters into the North Carolina SIP.
Regarding the commenter's statement that the SO 2 emissions limits should strive to be more strict, states have flexibility in how to structure their SIPs and EPA is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). North Carolina exercised this flexibility in developing its source-specific SIP revision for BRPP, and EPA is approving the SO 2 emissions limits contained therein as a SIP-strengthening measure because they are more stringent than any existing limits for BRPP in the North Carolina SIP and comply with the Act. Should North Carolina submit a SIP revision in the future with revised SO 2 limits, EPA would again evaluate the sufficiency of those limits based on the CAA criteria for approvability.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is taking final action to include regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference into North Carolina's SIP the conditions identified below from title V operating Permit No. 08961T29 issued by DAQ to BRPP with an effective date of June 2, 2020. These permit conditions relate to enforcement of and compliance with SO 2 emission limitations at BRPP for seven SO 2 emitting units. Specifically, DAQ has requested EPA incorporate into the North Carolina SIP: (1) Condition 2.2 J.1.b; (2) the lb/hr SO 2 emission limitations in Table 2.2 J.1 for the No. 10 and No. 11 Recovery Furnaces (G08020 and G08021), No. 4 and No. 5 Lime Kilns (G09028 and G09029) and Riley Bark, Riley Coal, and No. 4 Power Boilers (G11042, G11039 and G11040); (3) for the No. 10 and No. 11 Recovery Furnaces (G08020 and G08021)-condition 2.2 J.1.c.i; (4) for No. 4 and No. 5 Lime Kilns (G09028 and G09029)-condition 2.2 J.1.c.iii; condition 2.2 D.1.f.ii; Table 2.2 D-2; condition 2.2 D.1.h; condition 2.2 D.1.i.ii; condition 2.2 D.1.j.ii; conditions 2.2 D.1.l.ii, 2.2 D.1.l.iii, 2.2 D.1.l.iv, 2.2 D.1.l.v, 2.2 D.1.l.vii, and 2.2 D.1.l.viii; condition 2.2 D.1.m; condition 2.2 D.1.n; condition 2.2 D.1.o; and condition 2.2 D.1.p.iii; (5) for the Riley Bark, Riley Coal and No. 4 Power Boilers (G11042, G11039 and G11040)-condition 2.2 J.1.c.vii and Table 2.2 J.2; (6) Testing-condition 2.2 J.1.d, Table 2.2 J.3, and condition 2.2 J.1.e; (7) Recordkeeping-conditions 2.2 J.1.g.i, 2.2 J.1.g.ii, and 2.2 J.1.g.iii; (8) Reporting-conditions 2.2 J.1.h and 2.2 J.1.i. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving SO 2 emissions limits and associated operating restrictions, MRR, and testing compliance parameters from BRPP's title V operating permit T29 into the North Carolina SIP. EPA confirms that the SO 2 emissions limits and associated operating restrictions, MRR, and testing compliance parameters for BRPP are more stringent than requirements that are currently approved into the North Carolina SIP for BRPP. By incorporating these SO 2 permit limits and associated operating restrictions, MRR, and testing compliance parameters into the North Carolina SIP, these requirements will become permanently federally enforceable and strengthen the North Carolina SIP.
[top] Section 553(d)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"), 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), provides that final rules shall not become effective until 30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register "except . . . as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause." The purpose of this provision is to "give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their behavior
This final rulemaking does not address whether the specific SO 2 permit limits and compliance permit conditions from operating permit T29 are adequate for EPA to promulgate an attainment/unclassifiable designation of the 2010 1-hour SO 2 NAAQS for the Beaverdam Township Area near BRPP. However, final approval of these SO 2 permit limits and associated compliance parameters into the SIP, allows EPA to evaluate a modeling demonstration that these limits provide for attainment as part of the rulemaking on the 2010 1-hour SO 2 NAAQS designation for the Beaverdam Township Area in Haywood County, North Carolina. Final approval of this SIP under CAA section 110, does not prejudge the outcome of EPA's forthcoming designation of the Beaverdam Township Area, as that future determination is occurring as part of a separate rulemaking under CAA section 107 for all remaining undesignated areas in the country.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, if they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. );
• Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. );
• Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
• Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
• Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register . A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register . These actions are not a "major rule" as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 25, 2021. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.
[top]
Mary Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 52 as follows:
PART 52-APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart II-North Carolina
2. In §?52.1770 is amended by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§?52.1770 Identification of plan.
(d) EPA-Approved North Carolina Source-Specific Requirements.
| Name of source | Permit No. | State effective date | EPA approval date | Federal Register Citation | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Ridge Paper Products, LLC | Title V Operating Permit No. 08961T29 | 6/2/2020 | 11/24/2020 | [Insert citation of publication in the Federal Register ] | Only the following provisions: (1) Condition 2.2 J.1.b. (2) The lb/hr SO 2 emission limitations in Table 2.2 J.1 for the No. 10 and No. 11 Recovery Furnaces (G08020 and G08021), No. 4 and No. 5 Lime Kilns (G09028 and G09029) and Riley Bark, Riley Coal, and No. 4 Power Boilers (G11042, G11039 and G11040). |
| (3) No. 10 and No. 11 Recovery Furnaces (G08020 and G08021)-Condition 2.2 J.1.c.i. | |||||
| (4) No. 4 and No. 5 Lime Kilns (G09028 and G09029)-Condition 2.2 J.1.c.iii; Condition 2.2 D.1.f.ii: Table 2.2 D-2; Conditions 2.2 D.1.h, 2.2 D.1.i.ii; 2.2 D.1.j.ii, 2.2 D.1.l.ii, 2.2 D.1.l.iii, 2.2 D.1.1.iv, 2.2 D.1.l.v, 2.2 D.1.l.vii, 2.2 D.1.l.viii, 2.2 D.1.m, 2.2 D.1.n, 2.2 D.1.o, and 2.2 D.1.p.iii. | |||||
| (5) Riley Bark, Riley Coal, and No. 4 Power Boilers (G11042, G11039 and G11040)-Condition 2.2 J.1.c.vii and Table 2.2 J.2. | |||||
| (6) Testing-Condition 2.2 J.1.d, Table 2.2 J.3, and Condition 2.2 J.1.e. | |||||
| (7) Recordkeeping-Conditions 2.2 J.1.g.i, 2.2 J.1.g.ii, and 2.2 J.1.g.iii; | |||||
| (8) Reporting-Conditions 2.2 J.1.h and 2.2 J.1.i. |
[FR Doc. 2020-25464 Filed 11-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P