85 FR 15 pgs. 3903-3905 - Amended Record of Decision for the Installation and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio Site
Type: NOTICEVolume: 85Number: 15Pages: 3903 - 3905
Pages: 3903, 3904, 3905FR document: [FR Doc. 2020-01074 Filed 1-22-20; 8:45 am]
Agency: Energy Department
Sub Agency: National Nuclear Security Administration
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
[top]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security Administration
Amended Record of Decision for the Installation and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio Site
AGENCY:
National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION:
Amended record of decision.
SUMMARY:
[top] The Department of Energy (DOE)/National Nuclear Security
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For further information on the addition of the fourth processing line, please contact Ms. Casey Deering, Director, Office of Secondary Stage Production Modernization, Office of Defense Programs, National Nuclear Security Administration, telephone (202) 586-6075; or by email to casey.deering@nnsa.doe.gov.
For information on NNSA's NEPA process, please contact Mr. John Weckerle, NEPA Compliance Officer, National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of General Counsel, Telephone (505) 845-6026; or by email to john.weckerle@nnsa.doe.gov. This Amended Record of Decision is available on the internet at http://energy.gov/nepa.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In June 2004, DOE issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site (FEIS) (DOE/EIS-0360). In the 2004 FEIS, DOE analyzed the potential environmental impacts from the construction, operation, maintenance, and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) of the proposed depleted uranium hexafluoride (DUF 6 ) conversion facility at three alternative locations within the Portsmouth site. DOE reviewed transportation of cylinders (DUF 6, normal and enriched UF 6 , and empty) stored at the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) near Oak Ridge, Tennessee, to Portsmouth; construction of a new cylinder storage yard at Portsmouth (if required) for the ETTP cylinders; transportation of depleted uranium conversion products and waste materials to a disposal facility; transportation and sale of the aqueous hydrogen fluoride (HF) produced as a conversion co-product; and neutralization of aqueous HF to calcium fluoride (CaF 2 ) and its sale or disposal in the event that the aqueous HF product is not sold. An option of shipping the ETTP cylinders to the Paducah, Kentucky, site was also considered, as was an option of expanding operations by increasing throughput (through efficiency improvements or by adding a fourth conversion line) or by extending the period of operation. The EIS analyzed the No Action Alternative and three alternative locations within the plant, all of which utilized the same proposed equipment and processes. Location A, the preferred Alternative, was located in the west-central portion of the site; Location B was located in the southwestern portion of the site, and Location C was located in the southeastern portion of the site. A similar EIS was issued concurrently for construction and operation of a DUF 6 conversion facility at DOE EM's Paducah site (DOE/EIS-0359). In the July 27, 2004, ROD (69 FR 44649), DOE chose Alternative Location A and announced its decision to install three of the four processing lines analyzed in the EIS at Portsmouth.
DOE/NNSA now announces its decision to add the fourth processing line analyzed in the 2004 EIS. The process alteration to add the fourth process line is in response to the government's need to meet high purity depleted uranium (HPDU) demand to execute DOE/NNSA mission requirements. Neither commercial nor Y-12 capabilities exist to convert DUF 6 to DUF 4 to support depleted uranium metal production. This line will use utility equipment and materials identical to those currently in operation. The process will be altered slightly to produce DUF 4 that will be provided to a commercial vendor for additional processing.
The United States has produced DUF 6 since the early 1950s as part of the process of enriching natural uranium for both civilian and military applications. The EM sites at Portsmouth and Paducah are currently charged with converting approximately 70,000 DUF 6 cylinders into an impure oxide (UO x ) for disposition as waste or for reuse. The Portsmouth site currently has three process lines in place for this conversion with space designed into the process building to accept a fourth line. This space is the proposed location to accept the additional equipment items and provide the DUF 6 conversion to DUF 4 .
The Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Facility was commissioned to process the DUF 6 stored in cylinders into a more stable chemical form (UO x ). Current DUF 6 cylinder inventory at Portsmouth is ~19,000 cylinders with ~18 years of processing needed to complete DUF 6 to UO x conversion. Portsmouth has three operable process lines to accomplish this mission; each line is capable of processing approximately one standard 48? cylinder per 24-hour workday. The Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Facility and its infrastructure were designed and constructed to support four process lines, however only three lines were installed. The physical configuration of the building has already been satisfactorily evaluated in the FEIS to support a fourth process line with respect to seismic design criteria and natural phenomenon hazards. There is adequate space to support an additional process line with respect to the following equipment, utilities and support systems: Electrical power, sanitary water, process water, cooling water, hydrogen, nitrogen, potassium hydroxide, hydrofluoric acid handling, cylinder movement, material handling, instrument air, fire suppression, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), decontamination, emission controls, waste handling, and environmental monitoring. This utility equipment is identical to equipment currently in operation at the facility. The Portsmouth DUF 6 Conversion Facility meets the DOE criteria for a Hazard Category 3 Nuclear Facility.
Currently the facility reacts the DUF 6 with H 2 (hydrogen) and H 2 O (steam) to produce the UO x . This reaction generates hydrogen fluoride (HF) as a production/conversion co-product in molar proportion to the reaction. Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) is used in an off gas scrubber to neutralize the HF vapor which is not collected for resale. As decided in the ROD, the aqueous HF produced during conversion will be sold for use, as appropriate. If necessary, CaF 2 (Calcium Fluoride) will be produced and dispositioned.
Amended Decision
[top] DOE/NNSA is amending DOE's previous decision (69 FR 44649). DOE/NNSA will install the fourth conversion line and will slightly alter the process when reacting the DUF 6 . Typically, as stated above, the DUF 6 is reacted with H 2 and H 2 O (steam) to produce the UO x . The altered process will still react DUF 6 with H 2 but will omit the H 2 O (steam) from the initial part of the conversion process. The N 2 will still be used as an inert motive force gas and the off gas will still be scrubbed with KOH. At the
Basis for Decision
Implementing this decision supports DOE's continuing need to convert its inventory of DUF 6 to a more stable chemical form for use or disposal, as defined in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site (FEIS) (DOE/EIS-0360). In this instance, the use will be the production of DUF 4 that can be provided to a commercial vendor for later conversion into metallic depleted uranium for government use. The current proposal does not represent a substantive change to operations, activities, and associated impacts assessed in DOE/EIS-0360. Any applicable updates related to the International Building Code and life safety codes will be incorporated into the NNSA Conversion Project new equipment design. The proposed conversion to DUF 4 would reduce the UO x quantity that would need to be dispositioned at a commercial facility (sold, re-used, or disposed of as waste), as a quantity of DUF 6 would be converted to DUF 4 and HF instead of oxide. Processes and equipment used for this purpose would be similar or identical to those associated with current conversion activities. The total amount of DU planned for transport would remain unchanged from quantities evaluated in the 2004 EIS; however, the form of a small percentage of the transported material would change. Radiological impacts from handling/transportation between the two material forms are comparable. In the event of a container or equipment breach, a release of DUF 4 would result in reduced hazards in comparison to that of depleted uranium oxide because DUF 4 would be slightly less prone to becoming airborne.
In addition, the planned transportation destinations for oxide involve greater distances than the proposed destination options for DUF 4 . Finally, less HF will be generated during the conversion to DUF 4 as compared to the conversion to oxide material.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of December 2019, for the United States Department of Energy.
Lisa E. Gordon-Hagerty,
Under Secretary for Nuclear Security, National Nuclear Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2020-01074 Filed 1-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P