77 FR 172 pg. 54646 - Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 12-1(8); Correction; Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011): Whether a National Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)—Title II of the Social Security Act
Type: NOTICEVolume: 77Number: 172Page: 54646
Docket number: [Docket No. SSA-2012-0046]
FR document: [FR Doc. 2012-21799 Filed 9-4-12; 8:45 am]
Agency: Social Security Administration
Official PDF Version: PDF Version
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No. SSA-2012-0046]
Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 12-1(8); Correction; Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011): Whether a National Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)-Title II of the Social Security Act
AGENCY:
Social Security Administration.
ACTION:
Notice of Social Security Acquiescence Ruling; Correction.
SUMMARY:
The Social Security Administration published a document in the Federal Register of August 27, 2012, in FR Doc. 2012-21065, in the first column, correct the "title" to read:
Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 12-1(8); Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011); Whether a National Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)-Title II of the Social Security Act.
Also, in the second column, correct the heading to read:
Acquiescence Ruling 12-1(8)
Paul Kryglik,
Director, Office of Regulations, Social Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-21799 Filed 9-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P